Hensley Arrow: How does it REALLY work?
There have been several discussions on this hitch that have become somewhat 'controversial'. I am NOT trying to stir this controversy/bashing back up. Instead, I'd like to see a good, intelligent di...
Forum Discussion
Stressor wrote:Then I am totally opposed to the liberal scientific method. Bring on Sir William!
The liberal scientific method requires us to accept the simplest possible explanation that covers all the bases. The ghost of Sir William of Occam stands guard with a cudgel in hand for those who would violate this principle.
Stressor wrote:I don't care for either the patent language OR the marketing lingo on a website - neither of them are valid as scientific evidence, but you brought up the language on the website to try to reinforce your position. And now you're saying that you prefer the marketing language on Hensley's website to the language in the patent. How is that any MORE credible?
Tluxon,
Science does not care for legalese. I believe that the hitch projects the pivot point, as indeed it must in order for the linkage to lock up. I believe that this does in fact limit sway, and therefore the document is technically correct. How it does it seems to be missing from the patent application as it frequently is, and Hensley has recently granted us access to this information, illustrating it liberally, and telling us exactly how it does it. It is now up to us to accept it or come up with a better idea. I accept it.
