Forum Discussion
tluxon
Aug 31, 2005Explorer
Milt, if your proof is so good, why isn't anyone agreeing with it?
As far as the "principle of parsimony", the whole idea of being simple is to also be complete. Your proof has been anything but complete. For one, you've failed to explain how Hensley was able to make a pivoting pin that had the intelligence built into that only allows movement if initiated from the front "bar" but not the rear "bar".
Also, please explain why I've seen several Hensley owners comment that sometimes they see a slight wiggle from the TT but they couldn't feel it in the TV. Sounds like a great anti-sway device, but it sure doesn't sound like a "straight truck" to me.
Tim
As far as the "principle of parsimony", the whole idea of being simple is to also be complete. Your proof has been anything but complete. For one, you've failed to explain how Hensley was able to make a pivoting pin that had the intelligence built into that only allows movement if initiated from the front "bar" but not the rear "bar".
Also, please explain why I've seen several Hensley owners comment that sometimes they see a slight wiggle from the TT but they couldn't feel it in the TV. Sounds like a great anti-sway device, but it sure doesn't sound like a "straight truck" to me.
Tim
About Tow Vehicles
From fifth wheels to teardrop trailers and everything in between.194 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 29, 2025