BenK a past poster on here, possibly RIP as he was dealing with some BIG C issues. He helped design competition bicycles. He noted that the athletes would notice 1-2 ounces of less weight in a moving part, ie tire wheel combo, gears etc. vs it took 2 lbs to notice the reduction of weight in a non-moving part, ie the frame! So, a non-moving to moving part ration of 16-32 to one!
Let's assume this ratio hold true in our trucks. If we reduce the tire and rim weight by 1 lbs, that is a saving of 16 to 32 lbs of weight equal in the bed. Two drive tires we have a total of 32-64 lbs saving equal. 4 tires on a dually, 64 to 128 lbs.
Or as I did on my 05 DW DA combo, I kept the same tire size, a 215-85-16, went from a polyester sidewall tire, to a steel sidewall tire! Toyo M55's to be exact. They were 10 lbs heavier than the typical steel tread, polyester sidewall tire. 40 lbs of tire, equals around 640 to 1280 lbs of non-moving weight! I lost around .5-1 mpg. To say at times I noticed this, I did, a lot of times no. Bryan who also used to post on here, noted the same difference in MPG when he did the same with his totally customized DW E350 ext van when he put Toyo M55's on his rig. He had a 6.8L V10 with a 4sp auto IIRC.
BUT, mpg wise, I sure did. I did the same with my current 1500, went up an inch diam, but the tires are 10-12 lbs heavier being 10 ply 285-65-18 vs stock 265-64-18 XL tires. Ive lost 2-3 mpg depending upon driving conditions, and yes, my 285/305 4.3 V6 notices it a bit. BUT as also noted, I have a 6 sp auto, with 4.10 first gear, 3.42 rears, effective now a 3.23. I still out pull my BB 454's with TH 400 auto, 4.10 axle vs 2.48 first gear is tranny is taller than current setup. Along with three more gears to work with. 50 extra HP help, but down 80 lb ft of torque, but the gearing is an actual net torque multiplication, so easier to get the trailer at the same total weight going. A bit easier with the stock 265 tires too. Next time around, I'm hoping I can find a 285 in an XL, or drop to a 275- 65-18. I can find these 2-3 lbs heavier than the stock tires.
This is also one of the many reasons semi's are going with super singles. You can save 100-150 lbs total between the single 20" wide tire with aluminum rims, vs 4 10" tires on steel rims. Thats approx. 800-1200 lbs of unsprung weight gone! More payload, less HP needed to move the load! For us driving 10-15000 miles a year, probably not worth it, but long haulers drive 80-120K miles a year, even local drivers can do 50-70000 miles a year. a .5 to 1 mpg increase, ie 8 to 9 mpg, pretty decent savings!
Choose your poison, I'll take the lighter tire setup frankly!
Also as far as GCWR goes, its a performance rating only! IF one chassis has a 12K lb rating, same chassis etc with a bigger motor, springs, tires, axle ratio, transmission is rated at 15K lbs. The 12K rated one will pull it safe and sanely, you will just be slower! OR, an equipment trailer vs RV TT, I got 1-2 mpg more, pulled 3-6% freeway grade faster and a gear taller at the same GCW! That was due to aerodynamics. Ea additional 3 sq ft of frontal area, is the same as adding/subtraction 1000 lbs to the vehicle total. I pulled upwards of 12K with my 96 6.5TD K3500, its rating was 12500, a BBV8 was highest at 20000 lbs. Other than HP, same torque with both, I'd go a bit slower with less hp.......
Many ways to look at how well your vehicle may tow!
Marty