2.7 eco boost gets 18.5 mpg average according to Motor Trend
Dang topic heading was supposed to say 2.7 eco boost. Sorry can't figure out how to fix it yet. That's horrible. Not much better than 5.3 last year with a steel body Link
Forum Discussion
It sounds like a good review. But I am not impressed by the MPG. If the 3.5 eco numbers are indeed steel body numbers. It should just about equal the 2.7 when outfitted in the aluminum body.
The comfort and drivability I am speaking of is that with more horse power and torque I would expect an engine such as the 3.5 eco or even the 5.3 would pull with a lot less RPM.
The comfort and drivability I am speaking of is that with more horse power and torque I would expect an engine such as the 3.5 eco or even the 5.3 would pull with a lot less RPM.
