Forum Discussion
Dadoffourgirls
Jun 18, 2013Explorer
manley wrote:
I'm sorry, but I'm not buying these results. There's just way too much inconsistency in my opinion. Here's just a couple of the problems that I have:
1. GMC & Chevrolet - the results are WAY too different.
2. The Ram in 1st place? With a 1,000 pound payload? Seriously?
3. Look at the new 5.3 specifications... and tell me that the loaded / towing numbers can POSSIBLY be correct.
So there are differences in the GMC and Cheverolet. They may have had different tires, that would make some of the difference.
Number 3 - what exactly are you saying can not be possibly correct? Fuel economy, acceleration, braking?
The GM twins appear to be superior to the Ecoburst in fuel economy - towing and non-towing. And for the less than 1 second, appears to pull as well. I guess they were telling the truth when they said they would have a truck with better fuel economy then the ecoboost.
About Travel Trailer Group
44,029 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 28, 2025