Forum Discussion
37 Replies
- e-lightExplorer
alexleblanc wrote:
i'm still asking for a 3.5 Ecoboost option in the super duty. I'd be completely happy with that for my next SD, even more if the truck looses 300-500 lbs.
This would be awesome... - alexleblancExploreri'm still asking for a 3.5 Ecoboost option in the super duty. I'd be completely happy with that for my next SD, even more if the truck looses 300-500 lbs.
- Bionic_ManExplorerLooks like they are going all in. The weight savings they will get that will lead to better payload and MPG could very well be a game changer.
- FordloverExplorer
ib516 wrote:
LINK
Looks like it will follow in the F150's foot steps. Only makes sense.
I saw a story that was guessing most trucks will be Aluminum intensive by 2024.
Makes sense to make trucks alum first, because they are high profit, so there is more wiggle room on material/production costs, and the potential CAFE advantage for manufacturers is obvious.
I'm guessing GM and RAM won't be far behind at all. - BB_TXNomadEvery pound saved in the body adds a pound in payload, with the same suspension.
- Big_KatunaExplorer IIAnd Football team magnet makers shed a tear.
- Fastfwd75ExplorerWeight and MPG are probably not as important on superdutys but if they can improve it while staying competitive on price they will definitely do it.
What I am surprised of os that they use the heavy 6.2L engine on the raptor when they could use a much lighter engine with turbos.
About Travel Trailer Group
44,051 PostsLatest Activity: Sep 25, 2025