burningman wrote:
It makes perfect sense. Adding weight up front while in 2WD means more weight on unpowered wheels that the rear end must push.
A front drive axle adds extra weight up front. When it’s not engaged, it actually makes a little more work for the rear end.
All else being equal, theoretically a 2WD pickup should do a little better than a 4WD pickup, when the 4WD is NOT engaged
Thanks for explaining this for me, I was on the road over the weekend. From what I have been able to determine 4wd adds about 400lbs to the typical truck with almost all of it on the front tires. I used to go offroad with a friend that drove a standard cab 1/2 ton with a manual and granny gear, limited slip rear end, mud tires and kept some equipment in the back. He was a little more careful than the guys with 4wd but he went all of the same places that they did without spending nearly as much money. I am sure that many of us remember the old dune buggies that could go just about anywhere with 2wd due in large part to their light front ends.
Of course, if you are wagging a 20,000lb camper with a GCWR of 28,000lbs and only have 4 or 5,000lbs on the drive wheels that can change everything when you encounter sand or wet grass.