another insurance question - coverage exemptions?

Question

We have our TT, vehicles, and house all insured with ALFA, who I understand is the largest personal underwriter in Alabama. I've been their customer for 50 years. Good claims service, seemingly reasonable rate movement, seems to be decent price but I've only shopped around once.

Last week I received notice that in 2 months they will exclude from the TT coverage any loss caused by wet or dry rot, mold, mildew, yeast, spores, or deterioration, WHETHER CAUSED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY by the above.

To a layman this seems to exclude pretty much all water damage, even that caused by covered events. Say we drive under a tree limb that cuts the roof but we aren't aware of it until the ceiling starts turning black?? The roof cut is covered, but the mildew seems to delete the whole claim from consideration. I have formally requested a clarification.

Meanwhile I have an appointment this week with an independent agent to shop for either stand-alone TT insurance or maybe the entire package of business. Progressive seems to get mostly good reviews here on the forum, but that's another question.

MY QUESTION IS THIS: Are any of you aware of similar exclusions in your RV/TT policies from other companies????????? I just wonder if ALFA is starting something new, or just catching up with everybody else?

mike-s · Answer

It's perfectly reasonable, and expected, that insurance requires you to mitigate any further damage from an event (your "rot caused by roof tear" example). If you get a roof tear and water gets in, as long as you address the situation quickly the repair will include drying the water intrusion to avoid rot. And, with the terms you gave, that could include replacing water saturated wood (it wouldn't have had time to rot). They're just not going to cover it if you only realize/claim 6 months after the fact and it's too late.

I'll sell you a policy which covers all hazards and also allows you to be negligent with maintenance/repair. How much coverage do you want? Add 10% and send me a check. Coverage is limited to a single claim.

tundratower · Answer

Sure we have a duty to act quickly, but can only do that when we know it has happened. I don't inspect my roof at every destination. Lets say that tear was at the roof/wall seam and above the kitchen cabinets. I don't think we would notice water damage inside the cabinets until it got pretty bad.

Or lets say the tear happens on the way home and we park it at uncovered storage for several weeks or months and then discover the damage when we prepare it for the next outing.

A roof tear could be repaired for $2-300, but the resulting mold in the walls and cabinets before we found it could come close to totaling an inexpensive TT like ours. And according to this new endorsement, the mold/deterioration is not covered, whether the loss is caused "...directly or indirectly by the ....(items listed above)..." .

community alumni · Answer

It's a pretty common exclusion. A lot of companies have included them for some years now. I know for sure that both Progressive and National General have that same exclusion in their policies. A small caulking failure can completely total a trailer so I see why it exists. Normally these clauses say that water damage isn't covered unless it's caused by covered events. So if the roof failed due to a branch falling then it's covered. You're on the hook if you drive under a branch and don't discover the damage until months later.

As with most forms of insurance, negligence isn't covered. In this case not only did the operator cause the damage, but also failed find and report the damage in a reasonable time frame.

ralph_cramden · Answer

proxim2020 wrote:It's a pretty common exclusion. A lot of companies have included them for some years now. I know for sure that both Progressive and National General have that same exclusion in their policies. A small caulking failure can completely total a trailer so I see why it exists. Normally these clauses say that water damage isn't covered unless it's caused by covered events. So if the roof failed due to a branch falling then it's covered. You're on the hook if you drive under a branch and don't discover the damage until months later.As with most forms of insurance, negligence isn't covered. In this case not only did the operator cause the damage, but also failed find and report the damage in a reasonable time frame.Without pulling out the book, Progressives is worded something to the effect of..... damage due to water and mold not covered if due to continued water intrusion from normal events. Or some berbiage such as that.

carnationsailor · Answer

proxim2020 wrote:As with most forms of insurance, negligence isn't covered. In this case not only did the operator cause the damage, but also failed find and report the damage in a reasonable time frame.I disagree. Negligence IS covered with most forms of insurance. If I negligently cause an auto accident, I'm covered. If I leave a pot cooking on the stove while I run to the store and a fire results, I'm covered. Etc., etc.

Forum Discussion

another insurance question - coverage exemptions?

About Travel Trailer Group

Related Content

Progressive Insurance questions

Insurance Question

Insurance Question on a TT

USAA Insurance

Insurance Cancelled