Forum Discussion

lincolnmatthews's avatar
Jan 21, 2014

ANYBODY HAVE A LATE MODEL EAGLE CAP?

Just wondering if anyone has a late model EC? Are you happy with it? I'm leaning towards buying the 995 sometime by summer it all goes well. There is a 1050 for sale but it must be kind of an odd duck as its not listed on there site. It has a "hallway" where you would step up to go overhead, not sure if I would like a step to go into the bathroom (wet bath). I'm going to look at the AF 992 (a lot lighter) same floor plan as EC's 995. The EC seems to be well built?? but pushing the limits on my old Dodge dually 4x4 though.
Thanks for any informed opinions!

8 Replies

  • I was in the EC 995 vs AF 992 boat.

    In my opinion the EC was nicer in almost every way:

    -More outside storage (due to propane tanks being in the back)
    -Drinking water spout/filter (I suppose that could be added to the AF)
    -Fiberglass countertops
    -Nicer looking exterior
    -Better shower (IMO)
    -No pipe running through the kitchen closet
    -More kitchen drawers

    About the only thing going for the AF that I saw was larger propane, holding tanks, and the sliding drawer.

    Ultimately I bought the AF 992 because I got an end of the year deal that was $10-15k less than any comparable EC 995 that I could find.
  • Thank you all for your thoughts & opinions! When the time comes I will be checking them out, can't wait have a few "loose ends" to take care of first though.
  • yeah...IIRC all EC's have dual pane windows standard?

    It's tough to compare weights as it's not really apples2apples with the EC1160...some of the smaller floor plans are more similar (EC850 vs AF 811, etc), and in these models the AF was 400#-500# heavier min.

    In the end, EC vs AF was splitting hairs for us...they were both nice. In a SB camper, the EC850 had a larger dinette bed and shower...and those were deal breakers for us.
    They both have large tanks, good storage in+out, and both are beautifully finished.
    It was only when we looked at EC and AF that we quickly ruled out some of the other brands.
    You really need to see them all in person. Take your time.

    Good luck, Bill
  • Boatycall that is weird you dont have thermo pane windows they were standard windows is that something new. I never been in AF lot of people like them but i love my EC, Love the gel coat fibreglss finish and caps over filon anyday
  • Boatycall
    Thats a very informative comparison that you made between the two. I enjoyed reading it. And I agree with your comment that AF should come out with a double slide out model with the couch set up. The couch slide out is getting very popular. The 996 is nice but its basicly a "same style" AF just with 2 slides instead of one. I also think there are alot of people who prefer a dry bath in a double slide, and the 996 is wet.
  • billtex wrote:
    I would NOT say AF is lighter though...one thing AF is not know for is lightweight...

    Go look at both...they are very nice campers.


    I've owned both. I had an AF 1140, 1150 and now my 2012 EC 1160. I had my 1140 pre-Silver Fox (all wood), and my 1150 was a 2012 Silver Fox (Aluminum/wood composite). Had both for about 7-ish years. I'm on my first year with my EC.

    I went with the EC only for two reasons -
    * AF doesn't have any model with a sofa. You camp in a TC long enough, you'll understand why a sofa is soooo nice to have.
    * Price - I got a used 2012 EC for a price I just couldn't refuse.

    Here would be my comparison, as un-biased as I can be----

    * Build quality - Both are very good. EC wins, barely. I've done a lot of mods and upgrades to all of them, build quality I'd have to say is about a dead heat, with one exception--the filon on the bottom of the bunk tends to delam on the AF's. Myself, and numerous others have had issues with it.

    * Weight - AF wins hands down. My AF 1150 completely wet weighed 5,280lbs. My EC is over 7,200lbs MINUS water (On the same DOT scale by my house). And that can't be explained away just because it is a double slide.

    * Insulation - AF wins. I go through more propane on my EC. My AF did have double pane windows though, the EC does not.

    * Ease of lining up to load - EC wins. Why should they even be different? The AF has the "double step" in it's floor. Basement is on the very bottom, then steps up for the floor of the TC, then steps up again for the sites. That second step where the actual floor of the TC is caused me a lot of trouble getting past the bed rails.

    * Ease of actually loading - AF wins. Had Rieco Titan jacks on the AF, Happijac's on the EC. The Crappijacs are rated fully a 1/4ton each per corner LESS on a camper that weighs 1 FULL TON more. They audibly strain when loading or unloading, and if not PERFECTLY balanced, engage the wratcheting safety. Real PITA. This is my next upgrade - swap them out for Rieco's.

    * Customer service - dead heat. I have the same dealer that is the dealer for both, and when I called the factory for questions, both were great to deal with.

    * Space - no comparison, EC. And not just because of the double slide. The EC the floor is OVER the bedrails, 96 inches. The AF, the floor is tucked below the bedrails, 60". Down right cavernous in the EC.

    * Storage - EC wins, even over the AF1140. AF1150 was horrible outside, no one large storage area for things like bbq, Dish Tailgater, etc. The AF 1140 does have that one good-size side storage, but that's still less than half the size of the EC's basement storage.


    My final comment-- AF hasn't changed thier designs in over a decade. My old '04 1140 looked the EXACT same as a brand new 2014, no change in floor plan, just colors and other minor things. IMHO, they need a couple new, revolutionary designs, another double slide (like the limited production AF1160) or even a triple slide. They haven't matured with the rest of the market.
  • lincolnmatthews wrote:
    Just wondering if anyone has a late model EC? Are you happy with it? I'm leaning towards buying the 995 sometime by summer it all goes well. There is a 1050 for sale but it must be kind of an odd duck as its not listed on there site. It has a "hallway" where you would step up to go overhead, not sure if I would like a step to go into the bathroom (wet bath). I'm going to look at the AF 992 (a lot lighter) same floor plan as EC's 995. The EC seems to be well built?? but pushing the limits on my old Dodge dually 4x4 though.
    Thanks for any informed opinions!

    You might be looking at the advertised dry weight of that AF 992 as shown in the brochure. You have to add in the Fox Value Package which is another almost 600 lbs. I refer to it as AF's "standard option".
  • Hi lincoln, we did a lot of reserach last year before purchasing our new TC.
    IMO AF and EC are of similar build quality, ammenities, etc.

    I would NOT say AF is lighter though...one thing AF is not know for is lightweight...

    Go look at both...they are very nice campers.

    We are very pleased with our decision (see sig).

    Bill