BurbMan wrote:
one more comment and i am done here. if you want to talk about opinions and misconceptions, comparing transmission fluid to motor oil is one such. a 100% fluid change is not always advisable nor beneficial as it is with engine oil. Do some research on that...provide YOUR cited references that state that it is advisable to change 100% of the trans fluid. dont assume that it is obvious.
also regarding the flush...my buddy that owned a six bay shop had a trnsmission service machine that was basically two tubes that got inserted down the dipstick tube. Fresh fluid got pumped in one tube, old fluid extracted via the other tube. still not sure how it didnt just suck up the new fluid coming out of the hose right next to the pickup tube.
lastly, ligten up larry, life is too short. go camping! for me, looks like i have to go back to using my block list.....
Well you can say lighten up, but when misconceptions and outright misinformation keeps cropping up just like the one on not changing as much fluid as possible which is IMO BUNK and misleading. If you have a specific reference for what you are contending why didn't you provide it along with that outlandish IMO statement. I fail to understand why you have posted again and as far as I can tell have added ZERO to the discussion and have only muddied the waters with your IMO what can only be called crazy assertion that not changing as much fluid as possible is sometimes advisable.:S
These forums are for sharing knowledge which IMO should be factual and that is all I have done and will continue to do. If one chooses to ignore it fine, and if one questions my facts and I feel that has to have a counter response then I feel it's incumbent on me to do so since doing otherwise just leaves what I consider non facts or imprudent practice out there as being O.K.
On providing a reference on changing as much fluid as possible the real answer is for you, NOT ME to provide your reference why it's not advisable. There might be some EXTREMELY RARE CASE where that would happen, but I don't know of any and since you seem to why not share it instead of keeping it a SECRET:R I hate to provide references for the obvious, but
HERE is just one that by doing multiple basic pan drain via the dipstick tube and running the tranny each time does basically the same thing as I have previously described and will get over 80% of the old fluid out.
Here is an example of the above procedure with say a 5 qt pan and 12qt capacity tranny and doing it three times.
1st drain and fill - 5qts new fluid + 7 qts old => 12qts total of 58% old to new fluid
2nd drain and fill - remove 5 qts of 58% mixture and replace with new => this leaves 7qts of the 58% mixture which is made up of 4qts of the original fluid so now you have 8qts of new fluid and 4 qts of the original for a 12 qt total fluid which is a 33% mix of old to new.
3rd drain and fill - removes 5 qts of 33% misture and replace with new => this leaves 7qts of the 33% mixture which is made up of 2.3qts of the original fluid and 4.7 qts of the new fluid. Now you have 12qt that is a mixture of 19% old to 81% new.
Now that's starting to get better, but if you accomplish what I have been talking about you will get 95% new fluid and it only takes about 2 qts more fluid that the total capacity of the tranny. However if you were to do just one more drain and refill for a total of 4 that 81% jumps to 92%, very close to the number I have quoted.
BTW I think my Engine Oil comparision is an EXCELLENT example to use, but you have a right to your opinion, but you don't provide why you think it's a misconception or is misleading. Both fluids are for basically the same thing in different systems.
Larry