naturist wrote:
Um, Horsepower is calculated by multiplying torque by engine RPMs, so you can easily up the torque while dropping the horsepower just by decreasing the engine red line. More practically, if you optimize the engine to produce peak torque at lower rpm, you will decrease the horsepower in the process.
well, the first part is true. HP is related to torque x rpm.
However, increasing low end torqued does NOT necessarily mean lower HP. with current engine management, valve lift and duration control etc. many many engines have increased low end torque considerably AND increased HP as well. This started in the early 1990's with variable valve timing and now includes variable lift and duration as well, along with intake runner control and length that varies with RPM.
I have two 1997 vehicles (same engine) with an engine introduced in 1990 with variable valve timing. If it had "fixed" timing based on high rpm it would have had a very lumpy idle with very poor low end torque. similar to mid 60's muscle cars. However there is over 30 degrees of timing change between idle and high rpm and low end idle is very good and incredible low end torque with a very flat torque curve.
At the time it was introduced (1990) it was one of the few normally aspirated engines giving well over IHP/cu in. Common today but very uncommon then.
Now larger diesels with lower rpm limits may not benefit as much, and I'm not aware of any of the Big 3 (cummins, duramax, ford) that do this yet, I'm sure they are playing with fuel and turbo management to maximize torque and HP.
Now you can "have your cake and eat it to" to paraphrase.