Forum Discussion
jus2shy
Oct 01, 2013Explorer
Hybridhunter wrote:jus2shy wrote:
Well, I just moved up from a Daily Driven 2010 F-150 5.4L Crew Cab 4x4 to a 2013 RAM 3500 6.7L Crew Cab 4x4. The RAM is physically shorter than my F-150. ........................
To pick the 5.4, (sorry excuse of a motor, an engine that kept me in other brands for a decade), that was as inefficient as it was lacking in power for its size, to an engine that is more than 10 years newer? Turbo no less? I can imagine why you are impressed....
Maybe a more apt comparison would perhaps be the latest greatest Ford turbo engine, not some dinosaur that still lingers (in 2 valve form) in E-series vans.....
Not even sure why you would post that as a gas vs diesel comparison.
Well, for others with similar duty cycles and an environment, it looked like an ecoboost was maybe a 2 mpg improvement at best over the 5.4 motor given the terrain and how/where I drive (good ol' hilly PNW). The EPA stickers seem to back that assertion up as well 15/17/21 for a new ecoboost and 14/15/18 for my old 5.4L. I actually was considering moving up to an ecoboost, but when I saw members on the ford forum I frequented returning real life fuel economies that were either equivalent or only 1 mpg better than mine with similar trucks, I wasn't sold. I know the power would have greatly increased, but there wasn't as much of a benefit fuel economy wise as I was hoping the ecoboost would return.
So I am very familiar with how much get-up and go the ecoboost has. By no means am I trash talking the motor, it has its users and its benefits. However to own a truck with so much more capability, that weighs 2,000 more pounds and maintains superior fuel economy is far more impressive to me given my driving style and needs.
About Travel Trailer Group
44,052 PostsLatest Activity: Nov 04, 2025