Forum Discussion
44 Replies
- My_Blue_HeavenExplorer
languiduck wrote:
My Blue Heaven wrote:
This is an FYI, not a flame on Chrysler. Not trying to start a brand wars thread.
I wish this could be the case, but we all know where it will lead and the bickering that will ensue.
I don't see where this agreement is helpful to the consumer in any way. Does someone else see something I don't see? An owner is free to trade their truck in any time they wish.
I don't have anything against Dodge. If there was a buyback offer on whatever truck I had, I would like to know about it, just like I would like to know about any recall of a vehicle I owned. - languiduckExplorer
My Blue Heaven wrote:
This is an FYI, not a flame on Chrysler. Not trying to start a brand wars thread.
I wish this could be the case, but we all know where it will lead and the bickering that will ensue.
I don't see where this agreement is helpful to the consumer in any way. Does someone else see something I don't see? An owner is free to trade their truck in any time they wish. - RaftenExplorerWhat State Safety Inspection? CA?
- Reddog1Explorer IISuper_Dave, was your truck state safety inspection in California?
Wayne - Super_DaveExplorerMy 2006 is still brand new at 54,000 miles. The truck failed a state safety inspection for ball joints, which cost me $1,000. But other than that, it is the only repair that I've had to pay for over a 9 year period.
- TerryallanExplorer II
mkirsch wrote:
You can rest assured that Chrysler won't pay you any more than current "blue book" value for a truck.
What they're counting on is that most people will not accept the buyback, due to the fact that they're coming out on the short end of the stick.
You prolly right. The owner's are screwed. - mkirschNomad IIYou can rest assured that Chrysler won't pay you any more than current "blue book" value for a truck.
What they're counting on is that most people will not accept the buyback, due to the fact that they're coming out on the short end of the stick. - TerryallanExplorer III still of the opinion that Ram should just give the affected customers a NEW truck. That would solve everything. Other than that. they should have to buy them back at NEW truck prices so that the customer suffers no financial harm.
I'm not putting down any of the trucks. I just know IF they were to buy back my truck at Blue Book price. I could not go buy another comparable truck. It is only fair to leave the customer in the same condition they started with. Even if they gave customers a new truck, and have them still make the same payments on the original loan. that would be fair. - GordonThreeExplorerEvery huge company does this; gamble with cheap parts and bad designs, hoping not to get caught. Weigh how much they stand to make over the life of the design versus the potential for fines and lawsuit settlements.
Besides, if they can't settle a lawsuit and end up with a huge judgement against them, they go cry to the government... if we pay this judgement we'll close a factory in X state and blame it on the elected officials... and presto our tax dollars save the day. - mkasnerExplorerLong time RAM owner, and yes, this is related to the "death wobble". I also think the buy back is a ploy to get some of the older rams 09-2011 or so, with lifetime powertrain warranties, off the streets. If you remember a few years ago, no one was buying trucks or cars for that matter and Dodge had an incentive on certain model years, that included the life time powertrain warranty. The buy back will solve both issues. Could you imagine transmissions for LIFE!
About Travel Trailer Group
44,051 PostsLatest Activity: Oct 02, 2025