Forum Discussion
spoon059
Jan 08, 2018Explorer II
I was a fan of the Ecoboost when it came out, even though I haven't owned one. I might be getting an Ecoboost Interceptor sedan in the next week or two at work though.
My camper takes me out of half ton range though, so I'll be interested if/when Ford gets comfortable putting these in 3/4 ton trucks, even if that means a slightly reduced tow rating.
Ram offered the 5.7 engine in the 3/4 ton truck, with a slightly lower payload and a slightly lower tow rating than the 6.4 or 6.7 engines. Same frame, I would expect same or similar axles and brakes. If Ford offered a 3/4 ton with 2500 lbs payload and 13,000 lbs towing with the Ecoboost engine, that could sell a bunch. People that don't like loading a F150 up that high and like the "overbuilt" design of the 3/4 ton, but want lower torque than the 6.2 gas without paying the premium for the 6.7 diesel.
Again, it comes down to cost. If Ford could offer the Ecoboost in a 3/4 ton for a good amount cheaper than a diesel, I think they would sell.
My camper takes me out of half ton range though, so I'll be interested if/when Ford gets comfortable putting these in 3/4 ton trucks, even if that means a slightly reduced tow rating.
Ram offered the 5.7 engine in the 3/4 ton truck, with a slightly lower payload and a slightly lower tow rating than the 6.4 or 6.7 engines. Same frame, I would expect same or similar axles and brakes. If Ford offered a 3/4 ton with 2500 lbs payload and 13,000 lbs towing with the Ecoboost engine, that could sell a bunch. People that don't like loading a F150 up that high and like the "overbuilt" design of the 3/4 ton, but want lower torque than the 6.2 gas without paying the premium for the 6.7 diesel.
Again, it comes down to cost. If Ford could offer the Ecoboost in a 3/4 ton for a good amount cheaper than a diesel, I think they would sell.
About Travel Trailer Group
44,056 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 12, 2020