F150 2.7 EB vs 5L V8 towing mpg
The 2.7 EB truck had a 3.55 axle, the 5.0L had a 3.31, both 10 speed auto crew can 4x4s, towing a 7000# horse trailer. The 5.0L V8 rated at 395hp/400tq did 9.8 mpg The 2.7L EB rated at 325hp/400tq...
Forum Discussion
Was the 2.7L being forced fed +5.9L worth of air/fuel ?
It all boils down to how much total PSI the crank sees form each piston....other factors are number of and crank offset (lever arm)
The 2.7L will have more PSI per SQ inch, while the bigger displacement will have less PSI per SQ inch, just more SQ inches...
It all boils down to how much total PSI the crank sees form each piston....other factors are number of and crank offset (lever arm)
The 2.7L will have more PSI per SQ inch, while the bigger displacement will have less PSI per SQ inch, just more SQ inches...
Groover wrote:
snip....
The one with the turbo has less HP...when the turbo isn't force feeding...APT wrote:twodownzero wrote:
Not likely or perhaps even possible with less power by such a margin.
Wait, which engine has less power?
In a recent test a stock 2.7 outperformed a stock and tuned 5.0.
