ShinerBock wrote:
Allamakee1 wrote:
Ok..... So even if we accept your hidden numbers that still leaves the most powerful/less efficient is only purchased 40% of the time and customers opt for cheaper less powerful/more efficient engines options 60% of the time. That's not the vast majority you were preaching earlier.
There you go again leaving out information to fit your agenda. Combined the higher powered engines options(3.5L EB/5.0L) make up about 65% of engines sold. The less powerful versions of the two make up for 35% of engines sold. The 2.7L EB is an more fuel efficient alternative to the 3.5L EB and the 3.3L is the more fuel efficient alternative to the 5.0L for those that don't want turbos.
I’ve stated what I intended to in regards to a 3.0 and to address your options from an actual 3.0 diesel owner for anyone interested in this situation. Obviously people can display data points to fit their agenda, but since there are no more valuable points to discuss/debate let’s let our debate die to get this back on topic. People can go back and read both of our opinions and let them make up their own minds for their own situations.
