Forum Discussion
2003silverado wrote:
That wasn't the only "won", but it bothered me two. However, it should be noted those errors don't appear to be attributable to CR.The new range of Cadillacs (NYSE:GM) has been greatly praised, and several have one awards for the progress they have made in just a couple of years.
This is *bad* for an article from a major magazine. The editor needs to be fired.
And the Ford Super Duty is bad for people in urban environments? I guess I didn't know there was a compact car that could tow a fifth wheel.Hannibal wrote:
I'm 100% happy with my F250 except the seats could be a bit more comfy. Since I use my truck as a work truck in the city in tight parking garages and allies, I can't disagree with their assessment. It's a rock solid heavy duty pickup truck but it is a bit cumbersome where space is limited.
WTH are you talking about? you mean the Ford is bigger and a bit more cumbersome than a GM twin or Ram???? I didn't realize a size difference . They are all pretty much parking hogs :B- I'm 100% happy with my F250 except the seats could be a bit more comfy. Since I use my truck as a work truck in the city in tight parking garages and allies, I can't disagree with their assessment. It's a rock solid heavy duty pickup truck but it is a bit cumbersome where space is limited.
- The f250 makes a better urban runabout than my wifes fiat500 would make a work vehicle. Duh!
smarty wrote:
This article is dead wrong on the Jeep Wrangler...
For sure! They are consistently rated in the top 5 for resale value.
See here...The new range of Cadillacs (NYSE:GM) has been greatly praised, and several have one awards for the progress they have made in just a couple of years.
This is *bad* for an article from a major magazine. The editor needs to be fired.
And the Ford Super Duty is bad for people in urban environments? I guess I didn't know there was a compact car that could tow a fifth wheel.- That was a hard hitting quantitative article. How can you argue with the logic. Big trucks bad, expensive cars bad, leather bad.
BMW’s flagship sedan was determined to be the second-worst value within Consumer Reports‘ coverage universe, likely due to its high MSRP, presumably high insurance premiums, and high cost of ownership
the freaking car starts at $91k, do you really think owners care about insurance premiums and it's high sticker?
and do you really think people that buy $91k cars even read consumer reports?- That's the funniest article I have read in years. Can you believe a Jeep works like a Jeep and a truck works like a truck and luxury vehicles work like luxury vehicles. lol
- Must be a Toyota ad :B
