King of the beasts test (RAM 3500 vs F450)

I can't wait....:C

Wonder how long this one will last... before its shut down.

Nice trailers but repairs needed on a new trailer?
Can't wait for the results. Wish they could have included GM, but I understand why they couldn't. It will be interesting to see how far the Ram is behind on the 0-40 time. MPG will be another interest as the Ford is running a 4.3 to the Rams 4.1 ratios.

Those are nice trailers!

Still would be nice to see them do the test with one of those monster 40'+ toy haulers. I know they don't weigh as much as the goosenecks in the test, but I know I sure can feel wind drag more than I feel weight.

Am I the only one that thinks testing a 3500 against a 450 is goofy?

Hears an idea, why not test a 3500 against an F350? :h

...or they could do the test like they want, then down grade all loads so the chevys can get in it and do another test.I think it would be cool. The only reason to lighten the load would be for legality issues.

Turtle n Peeps wrote:
Am I the only one that thinks testing a 3500 against a 450 is goofy?

Hears an idea, why not test a 3500 against an F350? :h

N0 you are right. 3500 vs a 450 is comparing two different classes.

Maybe Ford is afraid of comparing their 350 to a 3500?

Turtle n Peeps wrote:
Am I the only one that thinks testing a 3500 against a 450 is goofy?

Hears an idea, why not test a 3500 against an F350? :h

I dont think the F350 can pull that much. That is why they are using the F450. I could be wrong though.

When I read the article it sounded more like an ad for the trailers then anything else. But that is just me.

Different badges, identical GVWRs of 14K lbs.

Do a test with a 20k lb 40ft. Toy Hauler/5`er then let us know! I don`t consider those trailers "monsters" either!

Weight is weight. It's all relevant. Only difference between a 40' 5'er and pallets of bricks is the wind drag. They would likely get the same results either way.