Forum Discussion
- Now this is horse duty......... I use to think this chart was pretty accurate but now I know it's not. My vote wasn't included. There's no way they could have tallied all the votes because I signed my papers around 8 0-clock on the 31st. LOL:B Oh well, I bought what I bought so that's all that matters.
fla-gypsy wrote:
Ram Fans, when are y'all going to push past the Chebby so we can have some real fun?
Probably around the 12th. of Never:B.....but being #3 gives us "room for improvement", and possibly higher sales numbers...but with only 6 years as a Dodge/Ram truck owner and 35 years as a Chebby owner, I don't qualify as a Ram fan just yet!:B- Ram Fans, when are y'all going to push past the Chebby so we can have some real fun?
thomasmnile wrote:
Gee, the 36K sticker on a new Tundra Double Cab with the 5.7L engine and tow package I looked at seems a veritable bargain compared to similar offering of the Detroit manufacturers...... Nonetheless, lot o' money!
It is cheaper because of this;
"6. Toyota Tundra"- Jealousy is a disease. Get well soon.
NC Hauler wrote:
fla-gypsy wrote:
Not surprised at Ford numbers at all, the others all seem to have fallen. The GM faithful will be along shortly to do some creative math while Ram breathes down their neck.
I'll bite cause we're buddies:B
Total for GM was 369, 436.. Over 45,000 more than Ford:B
Jim
:)
Right. Lets compare apples to apples not apples to apples plus raisins.- I love all trucks and currently drive a Cummins, but the total of Chevy and GMC without the little cousins they have spanks Ram pretty good. Ram is growing nicely and has nothing to be ashamed of however. In the towing categories they are everywhere it seems.
NC Hauler wrote:
fla-gypsy wrote:
Not surprised at Ford numbers at all, the others all seem to have fallen. The GM faithful will be along shortly to do some creative math while Ram breathes down their neck.
I'll bite cause we're buddies:B
Total for GM was 369, 436.. Over 45,000 more than Ford:B
Jim
:)
You're right and you and I know it makes no difference because we all get good trucks. Unlike some others on this forum who get butt hurt over their brand being #2 on the list each month. LOLEngineer9860 wrote:
fla-gypsy wrote:
boshog wrote:
fla-gypsy wrote:
Not surprised at Ford numbers at all, the others all seem to have fallen. The GM faithful will be along shortly to do some creative math while Ram breathes down their neck.
Seems to me you are stoking the fire-pit, shame on you.
I say congratulations to all the manufactures, good sales numbers for all (what is a Ridgeline) makes for healthy competition which is good for us as buyers.
You misunderstood me completely, I was just stirring the GM faithful. LOL
Infantile.
Yeah, but GM guys are really easy and predictable. What I think seems to really bother you, so who's being infantile? All that matters in this article is "1. Ford F series"Grit dog wrote:
No surprise, Ford leading the pack again......
But just remember, McDonalds sells the most burgers too. Sure they'll do the trick, but doesn't mean they're good for you! Lol
:) Hi, comparing Ford pick-ups to McDonalds hamburgers is absolutely the dumbest statement anyone has ever made and it seems as though someone on this forum says it in every thread on this forum that mentions Ford sales. You personally could probably make a better hamburger than McDonalds, but never make anything even close to anything that Ford makes.
