Not Very Happy#### update page 6#####

Robin1953 wrote:

sask934 wrote:
He bought a new TT and it is the dealers responsibility to provide a new TT in every way, they are responsible to present the TT in new condition and inspect the TT before doing the PDI.

Also may I point out the OP never said he did not inspect the TT air pressure, or lug nuts etc before taking the TT off the lot. He stated that he was doing his pre travel check (two weeks after he took possession of the unit)of his trailer and checked the air pressure of the tires and he noticed the poor valve stems etc....so he was doing as expected and now wants the deficiencies corrected as they should be! (Valve stems can look new when you use that tire cleaning product on them for a period of time!)

I was not specifically addressing you, but the whole group of people who like to point fingers where they are not required. The Dealer is the responsible party!

I agree with you that the dealer is the responsible party. I do not blame the OP for the dealer deficiencies. If you delve through the pile of paperwork you will probably find that you were charged for the PDI. But in the last case in which the guy with the earphones was ticking and not checking he indicates that he DID in fact check everything on the list. So my question to you is how do you hold him i.e the dealer responsible? In that case you have a he said he did the check and guess who the dealer believes?

I do not know about the earphone issues so I can not comment on that.

You are correct that you are charged a fee for the PDI and that only further obligates the dealer to provide a product that has been fully inspected and present the unit in new condition.

My issue is the amount of people on these types of forums who like nothing better to jump down the throats of OP and blame them. Offer up solutions not judgements!