Forum Discussion
ib516
Nov 19, 2014Explorer II
Bedlam wrote:
Wouldn't that be similar to someone presenting material on the benefits of carcinogens without showing the detriments? You even used a source that has everything to lose if it does not show Ford and the 6.0 PSD in a bad light. I might as well counter with Ford advertising brochures because they hold the same amount weight and objectiveness...
I am of the opinion that the OP can read what I posted and use his own brain to decide what he thinks. I don't think you give people enough credit. In any decision making process, the more info one has the better right?
There are some emails in that document that allegedly came from the engineers themselves. That is who one would best like to talk to about a given engine's potential weak points IMO.
But in the end, I am just one of many that have provided info that the OP can discount or take as gospel as he sees fit.
I think the way you are writing, you're assuming I attached a personal statement to the end of my post saying "The information contained in the link has been proven" or something to that effect. I did not.
He asked for opinions on whether or not to sell, I gave my $0.02 that he should sell. What's your problem with that? Do I have to check with you first before I post?
About Travel Trailer Group
44,056 PostsLatest Activity: May 04, 2014