Forum Discussion

ib516's avatar
ib516
Explorer II
Mar 24, 2014

RAM 1500 V6 vs GM's new 4.3L V6 - Davis Dam etc.

TEST


Summary of the article:

0-60 empty, uphill
Chevy 10.44 sec
RAM 9.71 sec

0-60 towing, uphill
Chevy 34.09 sec
RAM 31.94 sec

1/4 mile towing, uphill
Chevy 24.57 sec
RAM 24.35 sec

1/4 mile empty, uphill
Chevy 17.95 sec
RAM 17.57 sec

0-60, level ground
Chevy 8.90 sec
RAM 7.83 sec

0-60, towing, level ground
Chevy 17.15 sec
RAM 16.77 sec

1/4 mile, level ground, towing
Chevy 21.14 sec
RAM 21.11 sec

1/4 mile, level ground, empty
Chevy 17.11 sec
RAM 16.09 sec

MPG, empty
Chevy 21.7 mpg
RAM 22.7 mpg

MPG, towing
Chevy 11.4 mpg
RAM 10.7 mpg


Pretty decisive win for the RAM in every single performance related category. I'm surprised the higher tq and larger displacement 4.3L V6 didn't do better. Must be the 8 speed auto in the RAM that gave it the edge.

17 Replies

  • 45Ricochet wrote:
    blt2ski wrote:


    Anything to not like about the new trucks?

    Marty


    I don't care for the sticker price :B


    I would agree about that one! No matter the brand.....lolol
  • Perrysburg Dodgeboy wrote:
    Dadoffourgirls wrote:
    To provide more clarification, the 3.42 rear axle is standard on a V6 four-wheel drive truck. The article states that all V6 trucks have the 3.23. Only the two-wheel drive has 3.23. This also allows for a tow rating of 7100 lbs for the four-wheel drive.

    It is also important to note that the fuel economy for RAM empty truck was not the same RAM truck for fuel economy towing.


    Do you really think the Chevy is the same truck they use for it's fuel rating? Come one Man.

    I would think when the new GM/Ford 9 and 10 speed transmissions come out things will flip. So now the rummer at the plant is, Chrysler is going to build a 10 speed.

    Don


    Don - Yes, the Silverado mpg stats in the article were from the two, identical red Silverados; one towing a trailer and one not. The RAM mpg stats were from two, non-identical RAM pickups. The RAM towing the trailer had a better towing ratio, the non-towing had a better mpg ratio.
  • blt2ski wrote:


    Anything to not like about the new trucks?

    Marty


    I don't care for the sticker price :B
  • Dadoffourgirls wrote:
    To provide more clarification, the 3.42 rear axle is standard on a V6 four-wheel drive truck. The article states that all V6 trucks have the 3.23. Only the two-wheel drive has 3.23. This also allows for a tow rating of 7100 lbs for the four-wheel drive.

    It is also important to note that the fuel economy for RAM empty truck was not the same RAM truck for fuel economy towing.


    Do you really think the Chevy is the same truck they use for it's fuel rating? Come one Man.

    I would think when the new GM/Ford 9 and 10 speed transmissions come out things will flip. So now the rummer at the plant is, Chrysler is going to build a 10 speed.

    Don
  • To provide more clarification, the 3.42 rear axle is standard on a V6 four-wheel drive truck. The article states that all V6 trucks have the 3.23. Only the two-wheel drive has 3.23. This also allows for a tow rating of 7100 lbs for the four-wheel drive.

    It is also important to note that the fuel economy for RAM empty truck was not the same RAM truck for fuel economy towing.
  • Like a lot of things, if you want the first to the finish, top of mtn.......but the seats do not fit you, buy that one. If you want the one the seats fits you, but is not that much slower, do these differences in times matter? Compared to the day one got a 250I6 with maybe 125HP, and 200 lbs of torque, a 3 in the tree emanual tranny.......I have to say, EITHER of those trucks performance specs look great! Some of the V6's are putting out what was BB power in the later 70's to early 80s. Along with trannies that have double and triple the gears, better mpgs, by double all around.....better more comfortable seats.......

    Anything to not like about the new trucks?

    Marty
  • After reading, I can't believe that the V6 version cost that much......