Forum Discussion
jefe_4x4
Nov 16, 2016Explorer
Jim, thanks for the travelog and equipment comparo. Recently i had to deal with a gearing change and further had to mitigate the weight vs. power/torque vs. gearing equation. Coming from 3.54:1 pigs, and adding 35" tires and heavier wheels to the mix, I had to explore optional gearing for my GEN II RAM, 2-series truck with an NV5600, 6 speed manual with a 27% overdrive. This led me to this fun page: http://www.grimmjeeper.com is the best gear ratio calculator on the net, and I used it to develop a regearing strategy.
My two choices for a front Dana 60, and a rear Dana 80 were
4.10:1, and 4.30:1, both of which would fit my cases. I chose the 4.10's because of the lower torque max of the Cummins (which runs best between 1700 and 2000 rpm, and that they are stronger than the 4:30's), vs. the higher rpm comfort of the Navistar V-8's.
Ford certainly did their homework when developing gearing that would work in the specified power bands in their trucks for the most users.
jefe
My two choices for a front Dana 60, and a rear Dana 80 were
4.10:1, and 4.30:1, both of which would fit my cases. I chose the 4.10's because of the lower torque max of the Cummins (which runs best between 1700 and 2000 rpm, and that they are stronger than the 4:30's), vs. the higher rpm comfort of the Navistar V-8's.
Ford certainly did their homework when developing gearing that would work in the specified power bands in their trucks for the most users.
jefe
About Travel Trailer Group
44,025 PostsLatest Activity: Feb 06, 2025