JRscooby wrote:
Huntindog wrote:
As for the second question,, according to this test, the regeneration wasn't all that much.
At any rate, we would need charging stations at the bottom and the top of major climbs... And we would need a LOT of them since it takes so long to charge them... Talk about a traffic jam? That would be the mother of them all
I was not around then, but when Hank started to sell his Model T, there was a lot of the country where range was a issue.
The "We can't do it" people should pull there head out from between their cheeks, compare what the climate is doing to what scientist, (I know that the thought of scientist be correct hurts the right) told us would happen for the last 40 years.
If we don't change the way we move around, we will need to change the fact we move around. There might be something better than E-cars. If you know what it is, bring it out.
Back then all it was was building more gas stations.
Now they need to build an entire new power grid! Yes science is good, but reality is even better, just look at what happened to Texas. And now the NE with power outages. Some gas stations have backup power to offset that. And BTW, how do you think the majority of electricity is generated? Not from unicorns running on a treadmill.
Fact is you can store gasoline or diesel for months with no problem, kind of hard to store electricity unless you are fully off grid with enough solar and batteries to get you through a normal day.
