The China-Bomb debate Put to rest

Yabbut wrote:

rbpru wrote:
While the manufactures do not object to the use of LTs for TT service. I have yet to see a manufacturer's advertisement suggesting they are a better choice than STs.

In fact I have never seen an add even recommending them for TT use.

But let me guess, it is part of the great tire conspiracy.

I don't think it's a conspiracy -- it's just business. My theory is that STs have a higher profit margin than LTs, so it would not be sound business practice to drive customers to less profitable products.

I believe that ST tires are more likely to fail in "normal" service than the LT equivalent, which increases replacement sales. As long as they can continue to convince customers that ST failures were really the customers' fault, and that ST tires are better suited for trailer use (than LTs), they can continue to maximize profits.

I could be wrong, but I will continue to feel more comfortable towing LT-equipped trailers.

I think your basic premise is flawed: By their sheer numbers and the economics of scale LT tires have to be more profitable that ST's which are made in much fewer quantity than LT Tires.

And...there is absolutely NO data from any source that indicates the failure rate of ST Tires is any greater or lesser that LT's.

There IS plenty of data that does show that people mistreat and misuse their ST tires and the NHTSA addresses this. A lot of the rules they have promulgated are directed at Consumer information and education especially as it pertains to Proper Inflation.

And according to the NHTSA the VAST MAJORITY of tire failures are due to TWO issues: Overloading and Underinflation.