spud57 wrote:
jody h wrote:
spud57 wrote:
lbrjet wrote:
spud57 wrote:
Saw a news story regarding quality issues with the Ram truck when they go thru the quality inspection. Maybe this has put the production back.
Also in the same story, the union is protesting some shift changes. Hmm wonder if they're related?
If you actually read the article you would see it was for 1500 trucks.
Nice. How would you know what article I read? You are assuming I "actually" read the same article as you.
Then post a link about quality issues about the HDs.
Where did I say HD trucks???? I said Ram trucks!!! I also said "maybe this has put back production". If I was incorrect in my recollection of the story then there are certainly better ways to respond to my post than with these type of rude remarks.
First you post
"spud57 wrote:
Saw a news story regarding quality issues with the Ram truck when they go thru the quality inspection. Maybe this has put the production back.
Also in the same story, the union is protesting some shift changes. Hmm wonder if they're related?"
Not saying that its just the 1500 and not the HDs. This thread was about someone waiting on his 3500. Then when someone tells you that what you read was about the 1500 you get on your high horse and say
"spud57 wrote:
Nice. How would you know what article I read? You are assuming I "actually" read the same article as you."
Who posted the rude remarks? So your rude remark was saying thats not the same article so that leads one to beleve that you was talking about the HDs and not the 1500s.
