hedgehopper wrote:
At Walmart I bought an $8 lightweight, plastic, residential toilet seat and cover. With the hinge pins and cover removed, the Walmart seat fits on the Thetford seat and stays positioned fairly well. After our next trip (don't know when that will be), I will comment on how well it works.
Having returned from an eight-day trip, I can say that the Walmart-seat experiment is a success: Not perfect. But superior to the stock Thetford seat. My only complaint is that the Walmart seat moves around a bit on the Thetford seat – but not enough to make the combination unusable. And the standard Thetford cover cannot be closed with the Walmart seat in place.
My question: Why did Thetford not install a standard-size seat in the first place? The Thetford design could have accommodated such a seat with very minor changes.
Other than the seat, I have no complaint about the Thetford toilet. The flushing action is good and the quantity of water used is readily controllable. So why did Thetford ruin a perfectly good design with an inferior seat?