Forum Discussion
buddyIam
Nov 12, 2014Explorer
Carringb
I saw that on some of the C's I looked at. I thought it was a typo.
The long rear overhang is a concern of mine also. But that is also why I was thinking of a 84 inch Cab and Chassis. Nothing really interests me smaller than the Lance 992. That's 10 foot of floor on a 8 foot bed. Close to 5 feet of back overhang. So that compromises towing to some extent.
I love the mountains. The kids love the beach. Trying to find a compromise vehicle does just that. Compromise the vehicle. LOL
Wish I could find a 22 or 23 foot Class C on a 10' Cab to axle e 450. v10 and convert it to a 4x4. I don't understand why they put the 22/23 footers on a short wheelbase e350 and then give it such a long rear overhang.. And most of those don't have a v10. Oh well, for about 180 grand I could probably find one. :>)
I saw that on some of the C's I looked at. I thought it was a typo.
The long rear overhang is a concern of mine also. But that is also why I was thinking of a 84 inch Cab and Chassis. Nothing really interests me smaller than the Lance 992. That's 10 foot of floor on a 8 foot bed. Close to 5 feet of back overhang. So that compromises towing to some extent.
I love the mountains. The kids love the beach. Trying to find a compromise vehicle does just that. Compromise the vehicle. LOL
Wish I could find a 22 or 23 foot Class C on a 10' Cab to axle e 450. v10 and convert it to a 4x4. I don't understand why they put the 22/23 footers on a short wheelbase e350 and then give it such a long rear overhang.. And most of those don't have a v10. Oh well, for about 180 grand I could probably find one. :>)
About Travel Trailer Group
44,054 PostsLatest Activity: Dec 21, 2025