Forum Discussion
toedtoes
Sep 07, 2015Explorer III
Bird Freak wrote:
Lots of folks here are losing sight that the casino also has a cg but op wanted to stay in the parking lot.
He also states "I do not expect any action by Swinomish as their responses to my reviews has been inappropriate in the past" which leads one to believe that he has made the same comments over and over in multiple reviews. Why? Has he repeatedly stayed at this RV Park and posted reviews over and over complaining about the same issues? Or has he stayed once and just repeatedly writes reviews of this one experience trying to lower the ratings because he feels they are inaccurate? Or?
As I've said before, I don't think the review in and of itself is inappropriate. Even though the park has no control over many of the identified issues - they are issues that make sense to mention (if you cannot sleep if there's any external noises, then don't stay at this park, etc.).
However, there is something going on that the OP has not shared in his argument that the casino owners have treated him unfairly over a bad review. I suspect that his account at TA was disabled because he has taken on a "vendetta" attitude towards this one park and they saw his actions as inappropriate.
About Campground 101
Recommendations, reviews, and the inside scoop from fellow travelers.14,716 PostsLatest Activity: Oct 15, 2013