"Old fashioned State Parks?

Thank you Dog Folks. I felt I needed to get out of this discussion as my DH is a retired DEP land acquisition agent and I still have on-going projects with them. Again, I urge those of you who see need in the Florida parks to volunteer to do something about them. Join a Friends group, pick up trash, if you have a particular skill offer to help. lizzie

fla-gypsy wrote:
In Florida and I am sure in other states as well certain parks get all the upgrade and maintenance money. I suspect it has something to do with state politics and which state legislators have all the pull. Unfortunate but true in Florida nonetheless.

I respectfully disagree. We are seeing improvements in many parks across the state, not just the ones with high occupancy.

It is a slow process however.

Redsky wrote:

At state campgrounds in Utah, CA, MT, AZ, NV we pay less than $15 a night on average and often less than $8 a night.

Pleaaase tell me which CA state parks you are paying $15 or $8 a night, especially when the average cost for a basic no-hookup campsite in our Parks System, is $35!:R

If you want to visit well-run, inexpensive state park campgrounds, try New Mexico. $14/summer night for a paved 28'x36' RV site with 50A electricity and water at one of their most popular parks--Elephant Butte Lake.

Prefer a non-hookup, gravel site 40' from the lake and 25' from the restroom at cooler, higher-altitude Cimarron Canyon State Park near Raton? How about $10/summer night for a site with a level, 15' x 20' tent pad?

Don't know how they do it, but certainly hope they can afford to continue to offer these great bargains.

We've noticed a lot of the state parks now charge the "daily fee" AND the camping fee. Was before, if you camp, that includes an access fee. But with the budget cutting into much of our 'fun services' instead of reducing waste, once again, we campers get the short straw, even if we don't pick one at all.

If the parks are not careful, they will shoot themselves in the foot if continuing to raise rates and provide the same services.

I'd much prefer 'primitive camping' over hook-ups, and a price that reflects it. And that's the reason we camp at all. Otherwise, sit on your driveway, run out a power cord and a CTV, and enjoy your RV, why spend fuel?

I am glad that the state park systems have not changed their campgrounds to appeal to non-campers in large RV's who insist on having every conceivable creature comfort wherever they go.

The parks services could cut down trees and pave more land and run in new power lines and provide a place for large RV's to park and their owners to watch satellite TV from their lounge chairs inside. If they did this though they would destroy the area for campers and they would need to triple the fees to pay for the cost of adding and maintaining these services.

At state campgrounds in Utah, CA, MT, AZ, NV we pay less than $15 a night on average and often less than $8 a night. At RV parks we pay $35 to $75 a night and we are basically in a parking lot situation that may or may not have grass and may or may not have clean showers and restrooms - read the reviews on many of these places.

We have become a country that is owned by billionaires who are taxed at lower rates than fast food workers and so federal and state budgets for parks and campgrounds for the 99% are being deprived of the necessary funding to maintain them. Most state park employees qualify for food stamps at their income level and now we have retirees manning many federal campgrounds in return for a free space for their RV.

We should be sad for what we had and is being destroyed day by day and the terrible legacy we are leaving behind for future generations.

lizzie wrote:
fla-gypsy. You do know the history of Topsail Hill? The RV "resort" was not part of the original acquisition and the state did not want it. Several years later, it became part of a deal that enabled the state to acquire more desirable parts of the tract. It was take it or leave it situation, so they took it. It is a tremendous money-maker and is self-supporting but you will notice that FL has not built or acquired any more "resort" parks despite political pressure to do so. Neighboring states, GA and AL, have gone heavily into the resort concept and many of their parks are managed by private companies. lizzie

I am aware of the history and the tens of millions spent there since while others die from a lack of infrastructure like St Andrews

FSP attendance numbers (Top 10)

Honeymoon Island State Park - 1,044,295 visitors
Cross Florida Greenway - 998,927 visitors
St. Andrews State Park - 893,102 visitors
Lovers Key State Park - 846,012 visitors
Gasparilla Island State Park - 799,811 visitors
John Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park - 769,751 visitors
Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park - 657,184 visitors
Sebastian Inlet State Park - 598,459 visitors
Bahia Honda State Park - 582,093 visitors

Topsail Hill doesn't even make it in the top 10.

I noticed Traverse City state park was the same way... two old old yucky bathroom/ shower houses and way back in the park, a brand new bathhouse / restroom building.

Manistee SP is getting new sewers and electric right now, but I dont know if that includes replacing the pit toilets and yucky 1940's style shower house or now.

RAMBOY wrote:

bonscott wrote:

GordonThree wrote:
Are there any State/Federal parks in Michigan with full (sewer / water / elec) hookups, or even just water / elec, as in a water hydrant you can hook a hose to and leave it hooked?

There are a couple. I know that one of the campgrounds at Holland SP is for example. Just check the Michigan DNR website and you can search for such sites.

Michigan like many other states no longer funds the state parks and all money is generated by the entry fees and camping fees and they are on their own for upgrades and such. Honestly in Michigan most of the more popular parks have had their bathrooms/shower rooms replaced in the past 10-15 years. But obviously if you're camping in a more rustic campground you'll have vault toilets and such. But it is called a rustic campground for a reason. ;)

For me, if you want/need full hookups there are tons of private parks for that, leave the state parks and state forest campground more rustic.

I was at Lake Otsego SP last summer. Interestingly, they had 1 super modern bathhouse and 1 old fashioned bathhouse.

Van Buren SP is very popular but still has the old fashioned bath houses.

Interlochen SP is the same with one brand new bathhouse and one older one (last we were there a couple years ago anyway). Pretty much each SP has to pay for their own upgrades so it's up to the local management to figure out what should have the highest priority for the limited funds they have.

fla-gypsy. You do know the history of Topsail Hill? The RV "resort" was not part of the original acquisition and the state did not want it. Several years later, it became part of a deal that enabled the state to acquire more desirable parts of the tract. It was take it or leave it situation, so they took it. It is a tremendous money-maker and is self-supporting but you will notice that FL has not built or acquired any more "resort" parks despite political pressure to do so. Neighboring states, GA and AL, have gone heavily into the resort concept and many of their parks are managed by private companies. lizzie