Sad state of our National Parks-II
Again, this is not political. It is to our interest as RVers and for Camping World business to have an outstanding national parks that usually provide the cheaper camping facilities and best places t...
Forum Discussion
lane hog wrote:JRscooby wrote:
I thought Public Lands would include National Parks. I understand not liking political discussion. But a large percentage of RVers are interested in National parks, USACOE campgrounds, and other lands.
In the 15 years or so I’ve been visiting these forums, PLBDC has been about boondocking and dry camping only. Look at the sticky’s....all boondocking.
Discussion on established campgrounds on public lands.... has always been over in RV Parks, Campgrounds and Attractions....
https://www.rv.net/forum/index.cfm/fuseaction/listings/forum/29.cfm
You quote me, so I feel I need to respond.
In many threads I see signs where Mods have decided a thread was started in the wrong place and moved it. Over 3 weeks, and on page 19, maybe others think the location works. I never moved it, just responded with thought to what is in the thread, not where it is.
And also, I am certain that the hostility of the heads of departments, if left un-checked will lead to less chances of enjoying the parts that are not currently developed. To think "I don't use CGs, so why should I care about CGs" is pretty short sighted, IMHO.
