Forum Discussion
dieharder
Feb 25, 2014Explorer
docj wrote:
Joe:
I found the review that you are referring to. In its 338 words (according to Microsoft Word) there were less than 10 devoted to a description of the park. The remainder recounted the incident which you have already described. Our policy is that incidents such as this can be included in a review but should not be its principal focus. Because your review was primarily a recounting of this incident, it was deferred.
However, when reviews are deferred for this reason an email is sent to the address associated with the account and the author is given an invitation to revise and resubmit the review. The emails are automatically generated by the system so there is no possibility that it wasn't sent. I show no record of you having resubmitted this review. Did you receive the email? Do you still have access to the email account on file with RVParkReviews?
Out of respect for your privacy, I did not reprint your review here, but I would be glad to send it to you by PM if you don't have a copy on your computer.
Joel
Now to me, this explanation makes perfect sense.
About Campground 101
Recommendations, reviews, and the inside scoop from fellow travelers.14,716 PostsLatest Activity: Feb 10, 2025