fj12ryder wrote:
laknox wrote:
So, an ST tire simply isn't designed to withstand all the twisty-turny stress when you have to back into a tight space? If so, why are they sold as TRAILER tires to be installed in an application where that's going to happen on a somewhat regular basis? Just sayin'...
Lyle
From what I've read ST tires are not tested as rigorously as LT or passenger tires. So if you have a marginal tire it only makes sense to label it an ST tire.
As far as an ST tire "designed to withstand all the twisty-turny stress when you have to back into a tight space", I think that can be strictly attributed to marketing hype. If you've ever examined a good LT tire right next to a "good" ST tire you'd never believe that the tissue paper thin sidewalls of an ST tire will withstand anything like the stronger sidewalls of an LT tire.
Sorta my point, fj. :B
Actually, I think that the term "blowout" is a catch-all term that we use for catastrophic tire failures and that many of the "blowouts" people report are actually tread separations and that the carcass is still holding air. I will state that overspeeding ST (or any) tires is just asking for a tread separation and I feel that this is what hurt me on a very early trip, before I even knew about the 65 mph speed rating on my FW tires. I lost my first tire in my 2nd year and < 1,000 miles and the other 3 went the next year < 2,000 miles. One trip with about 100 miles of 75 mph speed, full pressure, mild evening temps and lightly loaded. Yes, classic Blow Masters were on the trailer...
FWIW, I don't understand why the mfrs won't take a proven LT that we like to use as trailer tires, make some minor cosmetic changes, up the capacity and label it as an ST. ST "Ribs" or ST "R250s" as 2 examples.
Lyle