โJun-30-2014 04:34 PM
โJul-10-2014 04:55 PM
Clay1969 wrote:
My much older truck has no problems at all holding 70-80 mph hauling our 5000lbs trailer on the flats
โJul-07-2014 07:54 PM
โJul-07-2014 05:38 PM
โJul-07-2014 05:20 PM
Clay1969 wrote:The Chevy 6.0L is really not a good pulling truck. The trans calibration allows it to shift all that time while pulling.Sprink-Fitter wrote:MM49Clay1969 wrote:
I have a similar set up (not a toy hauler, but similar lbs/truck) and from experience I can say that as long as you are not planning to break any land-speed records you will be fine. My much older truck has no problems at all holding 70-80 mph hauling our 5000lbs trailer on the flats at I can pull a modest 3 percent grade at 55mph @ 2500 rpm. Granted, I have a 5 speed and my old truck is not as advanced as the one you are looking at but the performance will be close or better. Some guys you will see will talk about their automatic 6.0's and complain about having to punch it out to 5000 rpm's to crest a hill but so far that is not my experience.
To piggy-back what Sprink said, you could opt for a diesel but you really need to factor the mpg savings over time into what the diesel will cost extra to make the best choice. For my 4-6 trips a year, getting 5mpg more in a diesel truck did not justify paying $15,000 more for the truck up front considering what little I haul, weight-wise. But hey, everyone's needs are different so you will not go wrong either way you decide to go.
Cheers!
I don't really care about gas mileage, I care about pulling and stopping power.
Pulling power and stopping power you will have with the 6.0, just not the acceleration. At work I drive a Dodge Sprinter that has a 2.7L turbo-diesel 5 cylinder engine. I honestly think the van could give my truck a run for the money in acceleration.
โJul-05-2014 05:59 AM
FireGuard wrote:
Are you set on the Chev?
If not, I would look at the Ram 2500 with 6.4 Hemi and 4:10, rated to tow over 15k lbs.
The 6.4 is getting some great reviews.
โJul-03-2014 08:23 PM
โJul-03-2014 02:34 AM
Clay1969 wrote:Sprink-Fitter wrote:Clay1969 wrote:
I have a similar set up (not a toy hauler, but similar lbs/truck) and from experience I can say that as long as you are not planning to break any land-speed records you will be fine. My much older truck has no problems at all holding 70-80 mph hauling our 5000lbs trailer on the flats at I can pull a modest 3 percent grade at 55mph @ 2500 rpm. Granted, I have a 5 speed and my old truck is not as advanced as the one you are looking at but the performance will be close or better. Some guys you will see will talk about their automatic 6.0's and complain about having to punch it out to 5000 rpm's to crest a hill but so far that is not my experience.
To piggy-back what Sprink said, you could opt for a diesel but you really need to factor the mpg savings over time into what the diesel will cost extra to make the best choice. For my 4-6 trips a year, getting 5mpg more in a diesel truck did not justify paying $15,000 more for the truck up front considering what little I haul, weight-wise. But hey, everyone's needs are different so you will not go wrong either way you decide to go.
Cheers!
I don't really care about gas mileage, I care about pulling and stopping power.
Pulling power and stopping power you will have with the 6.0, just not the acceleration. At work I drive a Dodge Sprinter that has a 2.7L turbo-diesel 5 cylinder engine. I honestly think the van could give my truck a run for the money in acceleration.
โJul-02-2014 09:22 PM
Sprink-Fitter wrote:Clay1969 wrote:
I have a similar set up (not a toy hauler, but similar lbs/truck) and from experience I can say that as long as you are not planning to break any land-speed records you will be fine. My much older truck has no problems at all holding 70-80 mph hauling our 5000lbs trailer on the flats at I can pull a modest 3 percent grade at 55mph @ 2500 rpm. Granted, I have a 5 speed and my old truck is not as advanced as the one you are looking at but the performance will be close or better. Some guys you will see will talk about their automatic 6.0's and complain about having to punch it out to 5000 rpm's to crest a hill but so far that is not my experience.
To piggy-back what Sprink said, you could opt for a diesel but you really need to factor the mpg savings over time into what the diesel will cost extra to make the best choice. For my 4-6 trips a year, getting 5mpg more in a diesel truck did not justify paying $15,000 more for the truck up front considering what little I haul, weight-wise. But hey, everyone's needs are different so you will not go wrong either way you decide to go.
Cheers!
I don't really care about gas mileage, I care about pulling and stopping power.
โJul-01-2014 02:10 PM
Clay1969 wrote:
I have a similar set up (not a toy hauler, but similar lbs/truck) and from experience I can say that as long as you are not planning to break any land-speed records you will be fine. My much older truck has no problems at all holding 70-80 mph hauling our 5000lbs trailer on the flats at I can pull a modest 3 percent grade at 55mph @ 2500 rpm. Granted, I have a 5 speed and my old truck is not as advanced as the one you are looking at but the performance will be close or better. Some guys you will see will talk about their automatic 6.0's and complain about having to punch it out to 5000 rpm's to crest a hill but so far that is not my experience.
To piggy-back what Sprink said, you could opt for a diesel but you really need to factor the mpg savings over time into what the diesel will cost extra to make the best choice. For my 4-6 trips a year, getting 5mpg more in a diesel truck did not justify paying $15,000 more for the truck up front considering what little I haul, weight-wise. But hey, everyone's needs are different so you will not go wrong either way you decide to go.
Cheers!
โJul-01-2014 12:48 PM
โJul-01-2014 09:50 AM
JIMNLIN wrote:OP asks wrote:
Looking at a 2011 Chevy Silverado 2500HD 4x4. Here are the specs for it...
Engine, Vortec 6.0L Variable Valve Timing V8 SFI (360 hp [268.4 kW] @ 5400 rpm, 380 lb-ft of torque [513.0 N-m] @ 4200 rpm) with (E63) fleetside pickup box; (322 hp [240.1 kW] @ 4400 rpm, 380 lb-ft of torque [513.0 N-m] @ 4200 rpm) with (ZW9) pickup box delete
Transmission, 6-speed automatic, heavy-duty, electronically controlled with overdrive and tow/haul mode (Requires (L96) Vortec 6.0L V8 SFI engine.)
Rear axle, 3.73 ratio
Can someone tell me if this truck is capable of towing this set up? The more I read, the more confused I become! Its all quite overwhelming to be honest!
Any advice you can give would be greatly appreciated!
Great match for your 9000 lb GVWR toy hauler. The 1500 5.3 is simply over matched with a 9000 lb GVWR trailer if it has the wrong gear selection and not set up properly.
Towing guide shows a '11 2500 chevy 6.0 3.73 can tow from 9300 lbs to 10200 lbs all depending on cab selections/4wd vs 2wd/etc.
Same truck with a 4.10 gears can tow up to 13k-14k lbs.
Both gear selections in the 2500 truck will have the same payload as both have the same RAWR/tire load ratings.
โJul-01-2014 06:39 AM
โJul-01-2014 06:27 AM
OP asks wrote:
Looking at a 2011 Chevy Silverado 2500HD 4x4. Here are the specs for it...
Engine, Vortec 6.0L Variable Valve Timing V8 SFI (360 hp [268.4 kW] @ 5400 rpm, 380 lb-ft of torque [513.0 N-m] @ 4200 rpm) with (E63) fleetside pickup box; (322 hp [240.1 kW] @ 4400 rpm, 380 lb-ft of torque [513.0 N-m] @ 4200 rpm) with (ZW9) pickup box delete
Transmission, 6-speed automatic, heavy-duty, electronically controlled with overdrive and tow/haul mode (Requires (L96) Vortec 6.0L V8 SFI engine.)
Rear axle, 3.73 ratio
Can someone tell me if this truck is capable of towing this set up? The more I read, the more confused I become! Its all quite overwhelming to be honest!
Any advice you can give would be greatly appreciated!
โJul-01-2014 05:15 AM
Old-Biscuit wrote:
OP stated:
Brought it home with my 2012 Chevy Silverado 1500, and almost positive I need something bigger? The truck was really straining under the load!
Trailer wasn't even loaded....
Pretty much says it all