โNov-29-2013 03:10 PM
โDec-07-2013 02:41 PM
โDec-07-2013 09:08 AM
โDec-06-2013 04:02 AM
desiphil wrote:
OP.. The Thor - Thor California product was decent in that time frame. All wood construction IIRC. Check for delam if fiberglass and irregularities in floor.
Bottom line. You are asking about a 11-15 year old trailer. If everything works and the structure is not falling apart and it doesn't smell like something died inside - you should be good to go.
โDec-06-2013 04:01 AM
SolidAxleDurango wrote:
๐
โDec-06-2013 03:08 AM
โDec-05-2013 06:12 PM
desiphil wrote:
Good lord. I step away from this place for 10 years and I see posters still can not get a simple straight-forward answer to a basic question. ๐
OP.. The Thor - Thor California product was decent in that time frame. All wood construction IIRC. Check for delam if fiberglass and irregularities in floor.
Bottom line. You are asking about a 11-15 year old trailer. If everything works and the structure is not falling apart and it doesn't smell like something died inside - you should be good to go.
โDec-02-2013 05:13 AM
โDec-01-2013 09:07 AM
โDec-01-2013 05:42 AM
mikebreeze wrote:
I've had mine for a little over a year. Thor owns Four Winds. I think that you have to put some work into all RV's in the form of maintenance and improvements. That I have done. But I have not had any major repair issues with my rig. Oh, and I have 137,000 miles on it. Bought it with 136,000.
โNov-30-2013 12:19 PM
B.O. Plenty wrote:
Thor is primarily a holding company for a bunch of manufacturers that for the most part operate independently much like Forest River does. Some of the companies made good products, others not so good.
B.O.
โNov-30-2013 06:21 AM
DutchmenSport wrote:
I'm a software tester, I test an Internet Site for a major financial institution. The idea of "quality" has come up many times in my profession. And I have finally come up with a definition of what "Quality" is: An item is said to have "Quality" when it meets the conditions for which it was created.
For example, a chair's requirement might be designed and created to hold the maximum weight of 125 pounds. So it's created with light wood, it's glued with an marginal glue, and it's finished with a mid-grade varnish. When someone who weighs 125 pounds sites on the chair and it successfully supports him, and the chair does not collapse, we can all agree it has "quality". It is doing what it was designed to do.
However, if a 600 pound man sits on the same chair and it collapses, far too often it's implied that the chair was not made with any "quality" and it's a piece of junk. Is it "junk?" Absolutely not! It was designed to support 125 pounds, not 600 pounds, so when the 600 pound person sat, it broke. That's not the fault of the chair, the manufacturer, or any else. The reason the chair collapsed is because the person who sat on it, had a wrong misconception of what the chair should do!
So it's the same with any RV. Quality is a relative term. Thor Industries has made successful and good "quality" RV for many, many years, as has many other manufactures. But it only takes one negative review to bring doubt on the entire industry. And if the truth be told, more than likely, the problem was not in the way the camper was manufactured, more than likely the owner tried to use it in such a way it was not designed to be used.
So when someone starts talking about "bad quality", keep this thought in mind!
(Not only am I software tester that has to deal with this very concept every day, but I also have a relative that weighs over 500 pounds, and every time I see him sit, I wonder if the chair will hold him because most normal, every day, chairs are not built to support that much weight!) -- a real example here!
โNov-30-2013 05:38 AM
โNov-30-2013 05:12 AM
โNov-29-2013 07:18 PM