X3 vs RZR 1k vs YXZ What say ya'llz

[sin_cal_hd]

I've been looking at all three.

I like the idea of the yxz without a belt and the paddle shift.

The RZR to me, has been around and seems to be the best one for all the options and looks.

Now the X3 has that evil bat mobil look that I like. But, there are so many different models and prices. Can someone break down what are the differences between all the X3s? I have notice they have 1 model wider than the other.

Hopefully to be buying early next year. Ive watched many YouTube vids on the them head to head. It's seems its all about preference really.

I don't care about the turbo options. Just would like general opinions on all 3.

[The_real_wild1]

Really depends on where you ride. I have a 2014 wildcat x as well as a 2017 rzr turbo. I ride with x3's as well. Both are great machines. I prefer the rzr for the woods but if I was in the wide open areas I would have gone x3. I also got a smoking deal on the rzr when they were blowing them out this fall. I am very happy with it.

[N-Trouble]

bedrocker wrote:
When is Honda going to wake up and jump in they could make a badass one if they wanted

Honda hasnt made anything “badass” in decades. Yawn...

[Blackdiamond]

N-Trouble wrote:

Blackdiamond wrote:
The X3 has 3 different versions for power, 75hp (just came out) 131 hp and 173 hp both the latter ones are turbos. I read a shootout between the top Rzr and top X3 said if you are into rock crawling go with the Rzr if you are into more open and high speed stuff or dunes go with the X3.

That was before they released the X3 RC (Rock Crawler). Only reason RZR gets the nod in the Visco Loc that Can-am has used for years is not a true locker. There are aftermarket options such as Halo and Torq lockers for the X3.

Another reason is low end torque, the RZR will take the X3 off the line to about 20mph then it is all X3 dominance.

[bedrocker]

When is Honda going to wake up and jump in they could make a badass one if they wanted

[Bedlam]

They need to do better at making a rumble seat in the load bed with 4-point harnesses and an extended cage. Sealed storage compartments behind the front seats could be converted to foot wells. This would appeal to those on tighter trails or with shorter trailers. I think Honda has something like this but the rest of the vehicle is lacking.

[mrw8i]

nayther wrote:

mrw8i wrote:
My next UTV will be a 4-seater, and that pretty much rules out the X3, have you seen the length of that thing?

I just saw one at the local dealer, OMG, that is a full size car, not a side by side. You need a regular car trailer to haul that, not a toy hauler.

RZR XP4 Length 146" - Wheelbase 117"
X3 4 seat Length 164" - Wheelbase 135"
Honda Odyssey minvan - Wheelbase 118"

[nayther]

mrw8i wrote:
My next UTV will be a 4-seater, and that pretty much rules out the X3, have you seen the length of that thing?

I just saw one at the local dealer, OMG, that is a full size car, not a side by side. You need a regular car trailer to haul that, not a toy hauler.

[slapshot12]

If you watch/read the various reviews, most of them will say the best for you will depend on the type of riding you do. RZR seems to better reviewed for trail riding, X3 for dunes, and YXZ is better at high speeds unless you get the optional clutch. All 3 are good machines, and I don't think you could go wrong with any of them. Just like buying a truck, look t them all and get the one you like the best and will fit your needs and wants the best.

[N-Trouble]

Blackdiamond wrote:
The X3 has 3 different versions for power, 75hp (just came out) 131 hp and 173 hp both the latter ones are turbos. I read a shootout between the top Rzr and top X3 said if you are into rock crawling go with the Rzr if you are into more open and high speed stuff or dunes go with the X3.

That was before they released the X3 RC (Rock Crawler). Only reason RZR gets the nod in the Visco Loc that Can-am has used for years is not a true locker. There are aftermarket options such as Halo and Torq lockers for the X3.

[N-Trouble]

They all use belts except the YXZ. No belt sounds nice but the YXZ is pretty limited in slow technical terrain. A high strung (11k RPM redline) engine combined with a gearbox and clutch makes for a lot of work.

Changing belts is not that bad. I can do my X3 in 10min on the side of the trail if I need to. To me a small price to pay for the great drivibility you get with a CVT in about any type of condition.

People buy “sport” UTVs for the performance and why I wouldnt pass on a turbo model. If turbo/performance is not high on you list maybe look at something like the new Yamaha Wolverine X4.

[sin_cal_hd]

Blackdiamond wrote:
The X3 has 3 different versions for power, 75hp (just came out) 131 hp and 173 hp both the latter ones are turbos. I read a shootout between the top Rzr and top X3 said if you are into rock crawling go with the Rzr if you are into more open and high speed stuff or dunes go with the X3.

Now if you are going to stick to the non-turbo models and 2 seaters I would go with the Yamaha, nothing beats their reliability, and no belt is a huge bonus....now for turbos... wait for the Textron (Articat) Wildcat Turbo, they have been using the Yamaha engine with a turbo in their snowmobiles for a few years (200+ HP) and rumor is they are going to put it in a wildcat.

I wish I were in the market, looks like fun trying to decide.

The X3 models are based on HP?

Turbos are an option but not a need.

I'm looking for all around riding. Sand, dirt, trail. I know these wide SxS are not ideal for trails. But, I'll manage.

[Blackdiamond]

The X3 has 3 different versions for power, 75hp (just came out) 131 hp and 173 hp both the latter ones are turbos. I read a shootout between the top Rzr and top X3 said if you are into rock crawling go with the Rzr if you are into more open and high speed stuff or dunes go with the X3.

Now if you are going to stick to the non-turbo models and 2 seaters I would go with the Yamaha, nothing beats their reliability, and no belt is a huge bonus....now for turbos... wait for the Textron (Articat) Wildcat Turbo, they have been using the Yamaha engine with a turbo in their snowmobiles for a few years (200+ HP) and rumor is they are going to put it in a wildcat.

I wish I were in the market, looks like fun trying to decide.

[sin_cal_hd]

My thing is with all the belts having to be replaced on the RZRs. Not something I want to be dealing with away from camp out on a ride. I know it's rare, but an a con for me. That's one reason I'm liking the YXZ. The X3 with all the different models, I can't figure out which is which and why. Other than the wider stance on one model.

[mrw8i]

I've had my 800S for 5 years. Turbo charged it. Suspension seats. Better shocks, etc. However, it will never compete power or comfort wise with an X3 or 1000XP. The X3 seems to be better outfitted from the factory than the 1000XP - like seat harnesses instead of belts. I'm not sure I would like the low riding position of the X3. My next UTV will be a 4-seater, and that pretty much rules out the X3, have you seen the length of that thing?