Class B Plus-Thor or Winnebago? Better quality?

you forgot the best one,, leisure travel van. all quality no junk.

midnightsadie wrote:
you forgot the best one,, leisure travel van. all quality no junk.

X2.
Absolutely thrilled with ours. Just bought it in March and have over 20 000 km on it. No issues, not even a loose screw.

I think in general Winnebago is perceived at least to have overall better quality. Both companies have had issues from time to time.

When comparing say the Winnebago Aspect vs the Thor Citation take care to look at tank capacities and storage area.

WE like our Aspect. This is our second Winnebago MH.
Have been very happy with the build on both.

I too am deliberating. View/Navions hold their value, so I am finding much better deals for same years on Monaco Covina's and other producers (though not the Thor Citations).

The Thor Citation / Siesta looks better to me, more streamlined, I like the way the front cap looks more blended with the body, but doubt it gives more MPG (seems like it should, haven't heard).

Monaco Covina - can't find any first-hand experiences or forum posts yet, still looking.

Any advice appreciated.

Thanks!