โDec-09-2015 02:22 PM
โDec-24-2015 05:32 AM
โDec-21-2015 10:43 AM
โDec-16-2015 07:06 PM
frankdamp wrote:
In most(?) Class A's, the seat belts for the driver and front passenger (usually lap-belt only) are attached to the seats, not to vehicle structure. I have no faith whatever in the ability of the Flexsteel seat to even stay on its tracks in an accident, let alone handle the seat-belt crash loading.
The odds are that you'll go sailing through the windshield still strapped to the seat.
โDec-16-2015 05:32 PM
โDec-16-2015 05:13 PM
msmith1199 wrote:Executive wrote:
2. Second Best Alternative
Drive the child in a passenger vehicle so they can be properly restrained and follow the RV (Class A, B or C's) .
This one has me shaking my head....someone will read this and secure their child in a seatbelt in their toad....:E......Dennis
I'd question their implication here. Is a smaller vehicle really safer? I don't disagree that if you roll your RV or drive it head on into a bridge pillar that you are in trouble. But how many RV accidents happen like that? I would argue that the vast majority of accidents involving RV's involve the RV impacting smaller cars and in the vast majority of those crashes the RV gets the better end of the deal. It's the very same concept as drivers of 3/4 ton trucks and Suburban's often come out way better in most accidents because they're usually running into something smaller than they are.
โDec-16-2015 12:45 PM
Executive wrote:
2. Second Best Alternative
Drive the child in a passenger vehicle so they can be properly restrained and follow the RV (Class A, B or C's) .
This one has me shaking my head....someone will read this and secure their child in a seatbelt in their toad....:E......Dennis
2021 Nexus Viper 27V. Class B+
2019 Ford Ranger 4x4
โDec-16-2015 10:18 AM
โDec-16-2015 09:40 AM
โDec-15-2015 07:00 PM
โDec-15-2015 05:47 PM
โDec-13-2015 06:32 PM
โDec-10-2015 10:42 PM
โDec-10-2015 03:07 PM
โDec-10-2015 01:33 PM