Is the idea on the smaller A's that having a longer tail shifts weight off the front axle?
Putting the extra weight on the rear must be the cause of the handling issues that folks complain about with the F-53 chassis.
I went through photos and the F-53 vs the E-450,
difference of the amount of rig forward of the axle only appears to be about 6 to 9 inches. Seating position of the driver is irrelevant.
So most of the additional 30" of rig outside the wheelbase is off the rear.
Thanks all, you got me to thinking a little differently on it. And better understanding the need for stiffening the rear to the extreme.