HappyKayakers
Aug 07, 2013Explorer
Antenna explanation
Since the subject of HD antennas comes up here occasionally, I just couldn't resist posting this link: http://money.cnn.com/gallery/technology/innovation/2013/08/07/worst-tech-lies/5.html
ScottG wrote:Assuming that the area in question is exclusively UHF. Nobody has shown that a Jack performs better than anything else, other than the marketing folks at King
The article is partially correct. There is no such thing as a HD antenna but an ant. that is specifically designed for improved UHF reception will work better for HD TV than one that was designed for VHF - like the venerable bat-wing. That's why antennas like the Jack pick up a lot more stations.
Janss wrote:
I guess I'm in kindergarten then, because I had been wondering why the often discussed Jack antenna, for example, labels itself as an HDTV Antenna
Janss wrote:
When I see HD TVs at my friends' houses, the regular old channels (non-HD) look worse on their TVs than on my old analog TV. Why?
Because of this, I hesitate to buy a new TV.
(Sorry to take this thread on a tangent, but it seemed a good opportunity for my inquiry.)