โDec-04-2021 02:27 PM
โDec-11-2021 09:26 AM
โDec-05-2021 01:21 PM
Tiger4x4RV wrote:The maps have been fine for years. These must be recent "upgrades", complete with grammatical errors too. People actually get paid to be this incompetent.
That's odd. When I looked there a week ago, the Salton Sea New Camp map looked OK. It sure doesn't now!
โDec-05-2021 11:44 AM
โDec-05-2021 09:41 AM
โDec-05-2021 09:27 AM
2oldman wrote:Nope, they're still getting paid, apparently there's NO oversite on these contracts.StarkNaked wrote:Yes, apparently they are. Devil's Canyon CG in Utah has the reservable numbered sites on the opposite side of the road from where they really are. I've mentioned this to Rec gov and the CG host a couple times over a period of two years, and nothing has changed. If you want the correct sites you have to dig up a picture of the sites from the campground reader board.
Looks like they are using the same map designer as Recreation.gov.!
I don't get it. Nobody cares these maps are totally wrong?
โDec-05-2021 06:08 AM
โDec-05-2021 05:10 AM
StarkNaked wrote:Yes, apparently they are. Devil's Canyon CG in Utah has the reservable numbered sites on the opposite side of the road from where they really are. I've mentioned this to Rec gov and the CG host a couple times over a period of two years, and nothing has changed. If you want the correct sites you have to dig up a picture of the sites from the campground reader board.
Looks like they are using the same map designer as Recreation.gov.!
โDec-05-2021 03:07 AM
โDec-04-2021 05:43 PM
StarkNaked wrote:That's exactly what I was thinking, one of the first things I noticed when the new contractor took over Rec.gov, that and a CG we've been going to for several years, was suddenly numbered backwards, and all the site photos disappeared.
Looks like they are using the same map designer as Recreation.gov.
And that is not a compliment!
โDec-04-2021 03:18 PM
โDec-04-2021 03:03 PM
โDec-04-2021 02:35 PM