Nov-12-2015 08:10 AM
Nov-14-2015 03:05 PM
Gdetrailer wrote:
I don't call "Cnet" a "reliable source.
Nov-14-2015 01:27 PM
docj wrote:
Windows 8 moves to BIOS-based product keysGdetrailer wrote:
Docj's post is 100% incorrect.
The program Docj linked does not look into the BIOS for the key, it actually looks into WINDOWS that is installed on the PC.
That program is useful ONLY if your COA with the license key is missing or destroyed to the point you can not read it.
That link also states that the COA is not included with new PCs, that is not true either.. That would be a violation of the manufacturers OEM licensing agreement with MS if they do not include the COA sticker on each PC they load Windows..
Here's an article that explains that Windows 8 pc's do not come with product keys because that information is embedded in the BIOS. I was posting something that I had read in multiple sources. If you disagree with this article please provide your sources.
Windows 8 moves to BIOS-based product keys
To save you time here's the relevant quote:
"One of the improvements Microsoft is making to Activation 3.0 for newly built machines that come preloaded with Windows 8, you won't have a COA (Certificate of Authenticity) sticker attached to the machine anymore. Instead, this will be embedded in the BIOS. This will avoid product keys from being compromised and OEMs will buy what they need."
My Toshiba Satellite purchased last year did not come with a Windows sticker or any other authentication information.
Nov-14-2015 11:25 AM
Gdetrailer wrote:
Docj's post is 100% incorrect.
The program Docj linked does not look into the BIOS for the key, it actually looks into WINDOWS that is installed on the PC.
That program is useful ONLY if your COA with the license key is missing or destroyed to the point you can not read it.
That link also states that the COA is not included with new PCs, that is not true either.. That would be a violation of the manufacturers OEM licensing agreement with MS if they do not include the COA sticker on each PC they load Windows..
Nov-14-2015 10:32 AM
CA Traveler wrote:docj wrote:OK But I remain skeptical that MS will allow validation of whatever OS is currently being installed while invalidating the prior install. Especially with regards to the free W10 upgrade that uses the existing W7/W8 key. They certainly don't want one key used in 2 computers at the same time.
The product key for many newer computers is embedded in ROM. In those cases you don't need to do anything to get a fully authorized installation regardless of whether you are upgrading or going backward. To check to see if your computer has an embedded product key you can use this tool: NeoSmart
ie I upgrade to the free W10. I then install W7 on the same or different computer. Which one is now validated?
Nov-14-2015 07:30 AM
docj wrote:OK But I remain skeptical that MS will allow validation of whatever OS is currently being installed while invalidating the prior install. Especially with regards to the free W10 upgrade that uses the existing W7/W8 key. They certainly don't want one key used in 2 computers at the same time.
The product key for many newer computers is embedded in ROM. In those cases you don't need to do anything to get a fully authorized installation regardless of whether you are upgrading or going backward. To check to see if your computer has an embedded product key you can use this tool: NeoSmart
Nov-14-2015 07:16 AM
Nov-14-2015 06:56 AM
Nov-13-2015 01:11 PM
Nov-13-2015 04:30 AM
CA Traveler wrote:
Doing a clean install of W10 involves using my W7 product key. What happens if I want to return to W7 with a clean W7 install?
I'd guess there will be activation problems because the W7 product key has been used for W10.
Likewise what happens if I want to return to W7 using a disk image?
I haven't seen answers to these questions. And with the MS push for W10 I'm at least suspicious of returning back to the prior version. All of this is tied to the free upgrade where the prior W7/W8 product key becomes the W10 product key.
Nov-12-2015 06:34 PM
Nov-12-2015 06:22 PM
Nov-12-2015 06:04 PM
Nov-12-2015 05:49 PM
Nov-12-2015 03:10 PM