โMar-30-2014 06:05 PM
โApr-17-2014 11:34 AM
ron.dittmer wrote:
I strongly lean toward the reason to go digital was primarily done for consumer entertainment benefit and growth of the economy. The opening up of those frequencies for 2-way communication was right behind it. A win/win except for a select few people like me and dodge_guy where our reception at home suffered.
โApr-17-2014 10:46 AM
zekegb wrote:
We redid our TV & stuff in our motorhome. Went with a Samsung 32", Samsun Blue Ray disc player, and Jack antenna. Used the Jack antenna once so far and the reception for broadcast stations was super.
Sometimes I think every time we try for TV is an adventure. But it is better with the new equipment.
โApr-17-2014 10:18 AM
โApr-16-2014 12:56 PM
dodge guy wrote:
This explanation does make the most sense so far. Crazy!
โApr-16-2014 05:55 AM
โApr-16-2014 04:29 AM
ron.dittmer wrote:
I work at Motorola Solutions, the company who makes communication equipment for the military, police forces, fire fighters, businesses, etc.
I recalled the hype around the office over going digital for TVs, the abandoned UHF and VHF frequency bands would be opened up for communication purposes. I am not sure that was the primary reason or just the resulting benefit to our industry. After 9/11 lots of things got changed up to help with national security, and maybe this was one area of change for that reason.
I strongly lean toward the reason to go digital was primarily done for consumer entertainment benefit and growth of the economy. The opening up of those frequencies for 2-way communication was right behind it. A win/win except for a select few people like me and dodge_guy where our reception at home suffered.
โApr-16-2014 04:27 AM
wa8yxm wrote:dodge guy wrote:
I still don`t know why they went to digital, never really heard a good reason for it!
That one I can answer and what's more I can answer it twice.
First: The government (FCC) required it.. But what is likely is the FCC requirement was put in place at the request of the industry. (The only way to do something where everybody does it at one time and not get hit with a "Collusion" charge is to make it a government requirement).
NOW: the official reasons as to why: With Digital each broadcast channel can carry 2,3,4 or more (I have seen 5 and I think 6) Layers of programming (Gets a bit low quality after 3 or 4) so more channels fit into less spectrum.. The FCC thus encourages stations to abandoned the VHF bands and the FCC wishes to re-sell that space to other services... Also since the broadcasters in many cases reduced their power (You do not need nearly as much push with digital, I will explain) there is a tremendous savings in electricity.. Some stations were hundreds of thousands of watts, now around 30-50 thousand.
The explanation: I work both digital and analog with my ham radios.. The same transmitter and antenna and freqauency band, VOICE (Analog) SSB (more effective than AM which is what analog tv (picture) was) I can work most of the US most of the time. Digital.. I cut it down to 30-40 watts and work most of the world most of the time.
THE REAL REASON (in my not very humble opinion) they changed.
TV sales were slowing as more and more homes already had one.. So the cash cow was drying up.. of course the old analog only TV's do not do ATSC digital video, so now that the world (Well country) has gone digital everybody had to go out and buy a new over priced Flat Screen TV.
More electrical savings as these things take way less electricity than the old CRT jobs. and of course. A nice fresh new cash cow for the industry to milk.
โApr-15-2014 08:58 AM
โApr-15-2014 07:28 AM
dodge guy wrote:
I still don`t know why they went to digital, never really heard a good reason for it!
โApr-15-2014 12:36 AM
โApr-14-2014 10:26 AM
โApr-14-2014 10:01 AM
โApr-13-2014 06:06 PM
โApr-12-2014 10:12 AM