Paid for but vacant sites
Most state parks in Iowa consider a site occupied if it's payed for. I find out from co-workers that some public parks they have been to require a payed site to be occupied with a camper or someone ...
Forum Discussion
Javi1 wrote:BluStem wrote:rv2go wrote:BluStem wrote:
I maintain if a site is payed for then it should be yours regardless if you have a unit on it or not. Why wouldn't it?
Using this principle, you are saying someone with the financial means could reserve the whole CG for weeks and weeks without occupying a site.
You bet. If it's payed for, it's taken. Very simple.
X2 If not then don't call it renting, when I rent a car for the week it don't matter to the rental company if the car sits in the parking lot or I drive it every day.
Campgrounds have limited space and a person that actually wants to camp should be able to use a vacant site. What kind of bad planning does it take to rent a site for days you aren't even there? What's so hard about actually planning and figuring out when you actually need a campsite. State and provincial parks are meant to be used by the taxpayers and they're funded by the taxpayers and having empty sites around everywhere because of lazy and selfish people wouldn't be right, hence the existing rules.
