Forum Discussion
Walaby
Mar 01, 2023Explorer II
Not that dedmiston needs to be defended, but in his defense, I didn't quote you so unless he scrolled back to see who said it, he wouldn't know.
You said that you were conveying that you "agreed with his preamble (or whatever), but disagreed with his conclusion. How about just saying "I agree with your description of the situation, but differ in the conclusion. Saying I don't disagree just confuses your argument
And for what it's worth, I wasn't personally attacking you either, which is why I didn't quote you. I simply stated I find it amusing how people have resorted to saying "I don't disagree".. instead of simply stating "I agree".
It really is okay to say "I agree with your description but have a different opinion on why it's important to follow the rules".
To say "I don't disagree", and then state in a paragraph or two why you disagree makes no sense and weakens the written argument.
It's clear how you feel about the issue, as it is equally clear how others do.
Mike
You said that you were conveying that you "agreed with his preamble (or whatever), but disagreed with his conclusion. How about just saying "I agree with your description of the situation, but differ in the conclusion. Saying I don't disagree just confuses your argument
And for what it's worth, I wasn't personally attacking you either, which is why I didn't quote you. I simply stated I find it amusing how people have resorted to saying "I don't disagree".. instead of simply stating "I agree".
It really is okay to say "I agree with your description but have a different opinion on why it's important to follow the rules".
To say "I don't disagree", and then state in a paragraph or two why you disagree makes no sense and weakens the written argument.
It's clear how you feel about the issue, as it is equally clear how others do.
Mike
About RV Tips & Tricks
Looking for advice before your next adventure? Look no further.25,102 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 18, 2025