โJul-21-2015 08:44 AM
โAug-02-2015 07:35 AM
โAug-01-2015 07:36 PM
โAug-01-2015 01:51 PM
bikendan wrote:NYCgrrl wrote:pnichols wrote:NYCgrrl wrote:
Oh well. Someone else will be staying at my favorite site 4th of July 2016 but I did get my second choice. Such is life for the slow
Good grief .... having to get reservations NOW for the 4th of July next year!!!
What is this world coming too, anyway. :E
That's not my idea of "free an easy" spontaneous camping. I'll camp in my back yard, first, before going to those kind of reservation extremes.
You reside in the less populated West; I live in the more crowded NE.
NYC, pnichols is in the minority out West here. most of us are at the mercy of RA also. there is HUGE competition for campsites in California, Oregon and Washington.
can you find campsites, sure but you have to go where most don't want to camp. even weekdays can be gone 6 mths in advance.
for coastal campsites, all will be reserved within minutes of them becoming available.
we don't camp in the summertime or holidays because of this. we prefer spring and fall when the crowds are gone.
โAug-01-2015 12:38 PM
NYCgrrl wrote:pnichols wrote:NYCgrrl wrote:
Oh well. Someone else will be staying at my favorite site 4th of July 2016 but I did get my second choice. Such is life for the slow
Good grief .... having to get reservations NOW for the 4th of July next year!!!
What is this world coming too, anyway. :E
That's not my idea of "free an easy" spontaneous camping. I'll camp in my back yard, first, before going to those kind of reservation extremes.
You reside in the less populated West; I live in the more crowded NE.
โAug-01-2015 11:49 AM
tatest wrote:NYCgrrl wrote:tatest wrote:
What is wrong is that the sites are reserved by people not actually using them. It is not unusual for someone to reserve (and pay for) a site for a two week window in order to have it for two or three nights at the end of that period. For the people doing this, the value of those nights is sufficient to justify the cost of a two week rental.
It may or may not be against the policy of a public park to tie up a facility but not use it, but separating the reservation system from park management makes it just that much more difficult to police, where policy considers it abuse of the reservations system. And for some parks, all they care about is whether or not the site is paid for, and so don't consider it abuse.
That doesn't make a lot of sense to me (reserving sites for a week and then only using 2 or 3 days)but I value my hard earned dollars too much I guess. I have been known to book several days and allow the first night to go by unused due to work or transport problems but that's it. On the bright side since I pre-registered I can enter the campground early in the morn before the office opens, settle in and present my paperwork later in the day.
Separating the reservation system from the parks happened in part because people were abusing the system and living at the park for the entire camping season. Saw that happening back in the 80's when I attended college near Taughannock Falls State Park outside of Ithaca, NY. Students, locals renovating homes and others just looking for less expensive housing, found a spot and NEVER moved until it got cold or the park closed for the season. This of course meant less of the public could use the campgrounds. And sometimes money exchanged hands under the table. RA and similar computer systems made for a more level playing field as well as allowing states to cut costs associated with payroll. It has it's problems but is inherently fairer and faster than past ways of making reservations as I see it.
Might not make much sense to you, but it makes sense to the people who do it. It is not just the reserved sites. I've been camped in Federal CGs two weeks before a holiday weekend, watched people drive in, set up a children's play tent, pay the fee for the two weeks up through the holiday, and drive away until the weekend, when they move in their RV. When you are spending several thousands dollars a year ownership costs on a RV you use only a few weekends, paying $100-200 camping fees for a site you don't use, in order to have the site the three days you want it, is just small change.
โJul-31-2015 10:03 PM
NYCgrrl wrote:tatest wrote:
What is wrong is that the sites are reserved by people not actually using them. It is not unusual for someone to reserve (and pay for) a site for a two week window in order to have it for two or three nights at the end of that period. For the people doing this, the value of those nights is sufficient to justify the cost of a two week rental.
It may or may not be against the policy of a public park to tie up a facility but not use it, but separating the reservation system from park management makes it just that much more difficult to police, where policy considers it abuse of the reservations system. And for some parks, all they care about is whether or not the site is paid for, and so don't consider it abuse.
That doesn't make a lot of sense to me (reserving sites for a week and then only using 2 or 3 days)but I value my hard earned dollars too much I guess. I have been known to book several days and allow the first night to go by unused due to work or transport problems but that's it. On the bright side since I pre-registered I can enter the campground early in the morn before the office opens, settle in and present my paperwork later in the day.
Separating the reservation system from the parks happened in part because people were abusing the system and living at the park for the entire camping season. Saw that happening back in the 80's when I attended college near Taughannock Falls State Park outside of Ithaca, NY. Students, locals renovating homes and others just looking for less expensive housing, found a spot and NEVER moved until it got cold or the park closed for the season. This of course meant less of the public could use the campgrounds. And sometimes money exchanged hands under the table. RA and similar computer systems made for a more level playing field as well as allowing states to cut costs associated with payroll. It has it's problems but is inherently fairer and faster than past ways of making reservations as I see it.
โJul-31-2015 09:06 PM
pnichols wrote:NYCgrrl wrote:
Oh well. Someone else will be staying at my favorite site 4th of July 2016 but I did get my second choice. Such is life for the slow
Good grief .... having to get reservations NOW for the 4th of July next year!!!
What is this world coming too, anyway. :E
That's not my idea of "free an easy" spontaneous camping. I'll camp in my back yard, first, before going to those kind of reservation extremes.
โJul-31-2015 10:34 AM
NYCgrrl wrote:
Oh well. Someone else will be staying at my favorite site 4th of July 2016 but I did get my second choice. Such is life for the slow
โJul-31-2015 07:49 AM
โJul-22-2015 05:25 PM
โJul-22-2015 03:52 PM
NYCgrrl wrote:2gypsies wrote:
Here's a link to that campground. It shows many sites with a 'R' (reserved) and some with a 'A' (available. Look under 'Date Range Availability'. Hope this helps.
http://www.reserveamerica.com/camping/alafia-river-state-park/r/campgroundDetails.do?contractCode=FL...
Your link doesn't show the date's info you prolly put in; just where the campsites are located for horses and RV and tent camping.
Still, I see lots of weekends available over the next 2 months (btw 3-27 open sites) including weekends and Labour Day. Maybe you want to change browsers,Bob Vaughn.
โJul-22-2015 12:12 PM
2gypsies wrote:
Here's a link to that campground. It shows many sites with a 'R' (reserved) and some with a 'A' (available. Look under 'Date Range Availability'. Hope this helps.
http://www.reserveamerica.com/camping/alafia-river-state-park/r/campgroundDetails.do?contractCode=FL...
โJul-22-2015 11:51 AM
โJul-22-2015 05:33 AM