โMay-20-2008 09:25 PM
โMay-23-2008 11:13 AM
โMay-23-2008 11:05 AM
The Weekenders wrote:I doubt all the disjointed bleating will result in him selling his truck, sounds like preaching telling everyone else to conserve. He's already stated he's collecting social security and has a job, and an RV. What more does he want, money doesn't seem to be making him happy? Gas goes up a couple bucks and it's the end of the world. Geeeeez.eltejano1 wrote:I have never heard so much "The sky is falling" as this post. Jeez you make me feel like just giving up and hiding under a rock. Jack, I would recommend listening to comedy such as Abott and Costello, Grouch Marx etc which I am sure will improve your outlook on life. JMO
Willald:
Maybe the full campgrounds are the result of more "destination" oriented trips rather than traveling every day. If so, that's positive. A lot of fuel will be saved by simply going to a campground or state park and spend the vacation there.
I never did like that. I always enjoyed keeping on the move. But that sort of thing would be prohibitive now.
I think this does indeed have the potential of being the end of OUR world as we know it, Willald.
Wing Zealot:
Sorry to see you go, but we've said about as much as we can say here. I guess I'll hang it up to. I'm starting to repeat myself. I think our point of view - that something has to be done to cut that 20.7 million barrels/day consumption -is the right approach.
Everyone here, with the possible exception of Joe :-), will eventually realize that you were right. In fact, I think they realize it now but just can't face-up it.
We are witnessing the end of an era, a major historical transition on a par with the Industrial Revolution of the nineteenth century - it's just that everything moves at such a rapid pace today, with modern communications and all, that people don't have time to adapt. Social and tech changes that used to take decades now happen in mere years, maybe even months.
There was a time when a strong military power - England, Rome, Japan, USSR, simply took by force of arms the resources they needed. But raw imperialism is no longer acceptable in the modern world and we are going to have to make drastic lifestyle changes to cope with much less petroleum, as the europeans already have.
We can't, as you have said, expect a private corporation to act in the public interest. That's 180 degrees away from what capitalism is all about. But, since energy really is a "public utility' in many ways, since people can't do without it, I look for massive regulation of the oil industry, possibly even involving price controls and rationing, and even a possibility of eventual nationalization - which is already a reality in most of the world. In any case, with the nearly inevitable regulation, rv'ing has no future. It's going to be a dinosaur that will be cited for a century as an example of wasteful affluence - with about the same social status as smoking.
It is already true that when we buy recreational fuel at these prices we are driving-up prices and hurting everyone. The govt will address that - probably after the election. This will likely develop as the #1 issue in the fall campaign, and the sides will line up traditionally, with Obama pushing FDR style intervention and McCain insisting on leaving it up to free market forces. It should be interesting - perhaps the hottest campaign since 1932 - and most likely a Democrat landslide.
It's over, folks.
Jack
Rick
โMay-23-2008 10:46 AM
Sea Dog wrote:
I am older,72, than most here.
It is amusing to read those who say they cannot cut back.
โMay-23-2008 10:21 AM
AO_hitech wrote:
We aren't being taken advantage of. Nope, record profits of Big Oil aside, and our taxes help them make even more money! But, we aren't being taken advantage of, not at all...
Soaring oil prices lifted Chevron Corp.'s annual profit to $18.7 billion in 2007, the fourth consecutive year that the San Ramon company made record amounts of money.
Chevron, America's second-largest oil company, reported Friday that its annual profit jumped 9 percent from 2006, as crude oil prices reached their highest levels in 26 years.
Exxon Mobil, the country's largest oil company, reported on Friday that its 2007 profit hit $40.6 billion, a 3 percent increase from 2006, while sales passed $404 billion. No American business has ever scored a higher profit.
"The major oil companies' incredible profits, boosted by multibillion-dollar tax subsidies to the industry, are ultimately clobbering taxpayers," said Judy Dugan, research director for the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights.
โMay-23-2008 10:03 AM
โMay-23-2008 09:50 AM
โMay-23-2008 09:38 AM
stevenicol wrote:
According to NBC News, the United States Military is the largest petrolium user on the planet. Our two top elected officials are career oil men. Let's see, in 2000 the BBL price was $29.
...when I open my eyes, I see?
Right, higher fuel prices.
โMay-23-2008 09:31 AM
โMay-23-2008 08:36 AM
Maybe the full campgrounds are the result of more "destination" oriented trips rather than traveling every day. If so, that's positive. A lot of fuel will be saved by simply going to a campground or state park and spend the vacation there.
I never did like that. I always enjoyed keeping on the move. But that sort of thing would be prohibitive now.
I think this does indeed have the potential of being the end of OUR world as we know it, Willald.
โMay-23-2008 08:24 AM
โMay-23-2008 07:52 AM
eltejano1 wrote:
Willald:
Maybe the full campgrounds are the result of more "destination" oriented trips rather than traveling every day. If so, that's positive. A lot of fuel will be saved by simply going to a campground or state park and spend the vacation there.
I never did like that. I always enjoyed keeping on the move. But that sort of thing would be prohibitive now.
I think this does indeed have the potential of being the end of OUR world as we know it, Willald.
Wing Zealot:
Sorry to see you go, but we've said about as much as we can say here. I guess I'll hang it up to. I'm starting to repeat myself. I think our point of view - that something has to be done to cut that 20.7 million barrels/day consumption -is the right approach.
Everyone here, with the possible exception of Joe :-), will eventually realize that you were right. In fact, I think they realize it now but just can't face-up it.
We are witnessing the end of an era, a major historical transition on a par with the Industrial Revolution of the nineteenth century - it's just that everything moves at such a rapid pace today, with modern communications and all, that people don't have time to adapt. Social and tech changes that used to take decades now happen in mere years, maybe even months.
There was a time when a strong military power - England, Rome, Japan, USSR, simply took by force of arms the resources they needed. But raw imperialism is no longer acceptable in the modern world and we are going to have to make drastic lifestyle changes to cope with much less petroleum, as the europeans already have.
We can't, as you have said, expect a private corporation to act in the public interest. That's 180 degrees away from what capitalism is all about. But, since energy really is a "public utility' in many ways, since people can't do without it, I look for massive regulation of the oil industry, possibly even involving price controls and rationing, and even a possibility of eventual nationalization - which is already a reality in most of the world. In any case, with the nearly inevitable regulation, rv'ing has no future. It's going to be a dinosaur that will be cited for a century as an example of wasteful affluence - with about the same social status as smoking.
It is already true that when we buy recreational fuel at these prices we are driving-up prices and hurting everyone. The govt will address that - probably after the election. This will likely develop as the #1 issue in the fall campaign, and the sides will line up traditionally, with Obama pushing FDR style intervention and McCain insisting on leaving it up to free market forces. It should be interesting - perhaps the hottest campaign since 1932 - and most likely a Democrat landslide.
It's over, folks.
Jack
โMay-23-2008 07:06 AM
TroyD wrote:wing_zealot wrote:
Speculation - lots of speculation but very little hard evidence. Prices are high because Big Oil companies are closing refineries to lower the supply and drive up demand Prices are high because Oil Speculators are jacking up the price. Prices are high because Bush is in office and he is an oil man. WE got enough oil for the next 60 years, its ________ fault. yadda yadda yadda.
Folks, in the United States alone we burn through 20.7 Million barrels of oil each and every day. You have any concept on how huge a pile that many barrels of oil is? Every day - being pumped out of the earth. And all that oil for just one little corner of the world? Now add in China, Canada, Japan, etc. etc. etc. How long do you think we can sustain that thirst? And you speculate about what is driving up the price of oil. It's hard to put the blame squarely on our own shoulders, it's easier just to blame someone else. Seems pretty clear to me. But hey, what do I know.
Yes, I do know how big that is, its a cube of oil about 475 feet square. A little more than 2 square acres.
Do you know how small 2 square acres is when you compare it with the enormity of the entire earth???
Running out of oil my foot.
Imagine, the entire USA uses a pool of oil every YEAR only 1.25 square miles by about 5 stories tall.
You would have to use the entire continent of the unites states to grow enough corn or soybeans and then you wouldnt have anywhere to grow food if you wanted to replace petroleum oil with biofuels.
โMay-23-2008 06:56 AM
โMay-23-2008 06:28 AM
โMay-23-2008 06:20 AM