drsteve wrote:
The money quote from the Truck Trend article:
When it comes to negligence or the failure of the driver’s “duty to tow only that which the vehicle is designed to tow,” Dean and other attorneys we spoke with about this issue agree: If there’s an accident and the towing vehicle isn’t properly configured for the trailered weight, the injured person or persons will probably win any ensuing lawsuit.
Read carefully...
Dean and other attorneys we spoke with about this issue agree: If there’s an accident and the towing vehicle isn’t properly configured for the trailered weight
Carefully crafted legal-ease to avoid tying to "tow ratings"
For example:
A vehicle with a tow rating of 5k is supplied by the Mfr with "P-rated" tires. Owner upgrades to LT tires of a higher rating and tows within hitch and axle ratings but exceeds the Mfr sticker tow rating.
Is it "properly equipped" ? Probably. It is industry practice to supply SUVs in particular, but also many trucks with lower weight rated (softer) tires for a softer, "fake" ride. Driver wins this suit easily.
I do believe if you are going to haul heavy, you should properly equip your tow vehicle and trailer and learn/train/practice how to safely and properly inspect, repair, and operate the vehicle with the load.
But I don't believe either of those articles are the "smoking gun" of the weight police ;)
BTW, the Truck Trend article is very poorly written. Comparing "properly equipped" tow vehicle with a speed limit? One varies based upon the vehicle, but the speed limit does not. You cannot add higher rated tires and you get to drive 100mph in a posted 55mph zone.
And this statement: "Towing more weight than the vehicle manufacturer recommends (per the owner’s manual or manufacturer’s towing-related websites)...{snip} is considered towing with an improperly equipped vehicle. "
Not an absolute, certainly not established case law. If they said "could be considered" or "along with other factors" or "in some cases" but making it as a broad sweeping statement of fact is unsubstantiated and (IMHO) irresponsible.
Then there would be the causal relationship. Did the "improperly equipped" portion CAUSE or CONTRIBUTE SUBSTANTIALLY to the accident? In some cases, probably. In others, no.
For instance, if an "overloaded" combination couldn't stop and hit a car that ran a red light in front of the towing driver, and it is (quite easily) determined that even if towing within or below the ratings would not have been enough to prevent the accident or severity thereof, it would be an irrelevant factor.
Certainly not the 'case deciding fact for an automatic win' as Truck Trend seems to imply.
Be safe, but don't be alarmist. It's like 'crying wolf' and often has the OPPOSITE effect ;)
PS- What about tire pressure? Low tires will get you a multi-million dollar judgement? "Improperly Equipped" per the door sticker, right?