โMay-03-2014 05:06 PM
โMay-03-2014 08:34 PM
TXiceman wrote:
Talk about beating a dead horse. You will never get people to agree on this issue. Some will believe that the 250/350 SRW is no difference and they can add air bags and be good to pull that 40' Teton. Then there are those that believe the manufacturers rating stickers and the manufacturers engineers.
Personally, I use a 4 cylinder Ford Ranger with E rated tires, HD shocks, a 25K 5er hitch, and air bags. It does just fine pulling my 40' King of the Road.
Ken
โMay-03-2014 08:06 PM
โMay-03-2014 08:03 PM
jmtandem wrote:This is in regard to the small difference between a 3/4 ton vs 1 ton SRW truck that in many cases is nothing more than 1 extra leaf in the rear springs on the one ton to increase Payload capacity.
If there is really no difference except a spring then why the greater numbpers on the sticker from the factory for the one ton in deference to the three quarter ton? Why don't you ask the factory what the difference is if you really care? Otherwise you are just revisiting the same old discussion. Get a list of the part numbers that are different between tbe 350 and the 250 and you might be surprised that is is more than just another spring in back.
โMay-03-2014 07:50 PM
This is in regard to the small difference between a 3/4 ton vs 1 ton SRW truck that in many cases is nothing more than 1 extra leaf in the rear springs on the one ton to increase Payload capacity.
โMay-03-2014 06:47 PM
MrVan wrote:
I know this issue comes often and gets debated heavily but I don't think this issue has been discussed from this point of view before.
This is in regard to the small difference between a 3/4 ton vs 1 ton SRW truck that in many cases is nothing more than 1 extra leaf in the rear springs on the one ton to increase Payload capacity. All other components on the two trucks are equal and the same. But if a RV'er adds air bags or the extra leaf to the rear springs on a 3/4 ton there are those who vehemently argue that that doesn't give the 3/4 ton the same payload capacity as a one ton version of the same truck. I understand that the door pillar sticker doesn't change when this is done but IMHO the load capability of the 3/4 truck is now the same as the 1 ton truck as long as the axle ratings and the tire ratings are not exceeded. In my example the axle ratings and the tire ratings are the same on both trucks which is quite common. Just the payload spec is different.
Ok, so the argument is the truck capability didn't change because the door specs didn't change.
Now lets consider this change. Lets say a truck originally came with Load Range E tires and the door sticker so referenced that in its weight ratings. But the owner replaces the Load Range E tires with Load Range D tires. Now if one follows the above logic the truck capability didn't change because the door sticker didn't change. I don't buy into that at all. The trucks load capability has been reduced but the sticker didn't change.
So it seems to me that using the argument that since the door sticker didn't change when an owner makes significant changes to the truck when going up in weight capability doesn't hold water when the owner makes changes going down in weight capability. To me the argument is pure argumentive rather than based on facts.
โMay-03-2014 05:54 PM
โMay-03-2014 05:29 PM