โApr-29-2014 08:42 PM
โMay-01-2014 01:27 PM
gmw photos wrote:
If it was mine I would take it to the CAT scale and verify the FALR. As to the difference between towing with or without the quads, I am wondering if, for instance you have it right w/quads with six links hanging, then simply dropping to seven links hanging when you have no quads, might be right ?
Being the pedantic type I am, I would verify that too at the scales, but that's probably just me. I enjoy messing with this stuff. Other folks just wanna drop it on the ball and go.
โMay-01-2014 10:58 AM
โMay-01-2014 10:43 AM
โApr-30-2014 09:07 PM
โApr-30-2014 11:04 AM
BarneyS wrote:
Your hitch setup looks pretty good to me. Not all trunnion bars will point down when drawn up by the chains but many do. You have plenty of clearance for the chains to move forward and backwards and also plenty of clearance at the front of the A frame/bars intersection (helped by the high rise ball). As long as you are getting the WD you need and are not getting any sway or loss of control feelings while driving, I would not change anything.
It is also not unusual for the hitch setup to remain the same when changing tow vehicles. As long as the distance from receiver to ground is the same as before, and the loading on the trailer is the same, there should be no reason to change the hitch setup. If the back end of the truck rises too much without the quads and the 6 links, then I would just increase the number of links under tension to 7 or 8 to reduce the WD.
Barney
โApr-30-2014 10:56 AM
campigloo wrote:
The idea of the length of chain is to allow you to turn without crunching the bar into the A-frame, so pointed slightly down is ok. When you lighten the tongue weight, it could be that the only adjustment you would need to make is the selection of which link to use. Just dropping down on or two links can make a significant difference.
I like your trailer. I don't have 4 wheelers, but what a neat place for a deck!
โApr-30-2014 07:28 AM
โApr-30-2014 04:53 AM